Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsSupreme Court Directs Expeditious Hearing in Domestic Violence Case Involving Raja Bhaiya

Supreme Court Directs Expeditious Hearing in Domestic Violence Case Involving Raja Bhaiya

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court  disposed of a petition filed by Ms. Bhanvi Kumari Singh, wife of Shri Raghuraj Pratap Singh alias Raja Bhaiya, challenging the stay granted by the High Court on the summoning order in a domestic violence case.

After considering the submissions by Adv. Mr Arvind Kumar Shukla, the Supreme Court directed the High Court to decide the pending matter expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months. The Court further clarified that other reliefs, including claims relating to interim maintenance and connected issues, may be pressed before the appropriate forum at the relevant stage of proceedings.

The domestic violence proceedings were initiated by Ms. Bhanvi Kumari Singh against Shri Raja Bhaiya, a former Minister in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The case arises from allegations of severe physical abuse, which are stated to have resulted in grievous injuries to the complainant. The matter is presently at the stage where a charge sheet has been filed by the police, including offences under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and other allied provisions.

It was also brought to the Court’s attention that no financial support has been extended to the wife and daughters, despite substantial financial transactions allegedly made in favour of family members during the pendency of proceedings.

Arguments were addressed by Adv. Mr Arvind Kumar Shukla  today, and the matter has been reserved for orders by the concerned court, which are scheduled to be pronounced on 3 February 2026.

Read More: DGFT Can’t Curtail Export Incentives by “Clarificatory” Circular: Delhi HC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Orissa High Court Dismisses Successive Writ Petition Challenging GST Demand

The Orissa High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed challenging a GST adjudication...

S. 110(5) Customs Act: Patna HC Mandates Pre-Decisional Hearing Before Attachment Extension

The Patna High Court has held that the extension of a provisional bank-account attachment...

CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Rent-a-Cab and Staff Welfare Expenses

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Delayed Payment Alone Can’t Trigger Higher Duty on All Packing Machines: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench has held that...

More like this

Orissa High Court Dismisses Successive Writ Petition Challenging GST Demand

The Orissa High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed challenging a GST adjudication...

S. 110(5) Customs Act: Patna HC Mandates Pre-Decisional Hearing Before Attachment Extension

The Patna High Court has held that the extension of a provisional bank-account attachment...

CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Rent-a-Cab and Staff Welfare Expenses

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...