HomeOther LawsDestruction Of Government Property At Collectorate Office : CBI Court Sentences Three...

Destruction Of Government Property At Collectorate Office : CBI Court Sentences Three Accused Advocates

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The CBI court has sentenced three accused advocates for destructing government property at the Collectorate Office.

The Court of Special Judicial Magistrate, CBI cases, Lucknow sentenced three accused advocates namely Shri Sunil Tondon, Shri Dharmendra Mishra and Shri Sunil Bajpai to one year’s Imprisonment with total fine of Rs. 7,500/- in a case related to destruction of government property at Collectorate Office, Etawah (UP) and causing hurt to Govt. servants by unruly behaviors on 15.09.2000.

CBI registered the instant case, on the basis of an order of the Allahabad High Court passed in Crl. Misc. (PIL), by taking over investigation of case crime no. 303/2000 of PS Civil Lines, Etawah (UP).

After investigation, CBI filed charge-sheet on 28.06.2011 against accused Veerendra Singh Yadav, Avneesh Chauhan, Sunil Tandon, Sunil Bajpai and Dharmendra Mishra u/s 143, 147, 323 r/w 149 and 332 of IPC and against Veerendra Singh Yadav  u/s 153 IPC also.

During trial 2 accused Avneesh Chauhan and Veerendra Yadav died and proceedings against them were abated.

After trial, the Court found the remaining accused guilty and sentenced them accordingly.

Click Here To Read Press Release

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's judgment holding...

GST Proceedings Against Firm for Availing ITC from Cancelled Dealers: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's...

Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that a director cannot be prosecuted...

Coal Beneficiation Not Taxable as ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ Before June 1, 2007: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

More like this

Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's judgment holding...

GST Proceedings Against Firm for Availing ITC from Cancelled Dealers: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's...

Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that a director cannot be prosecuted...