Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsDestruction Of Government Property At Collectorate Office : CBI Court Sentences Three...

Destruction Of Government Property At Collectorate Office : CBI Court Sentences Three Accused Advocates

Other LawsBreaking

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Destruction Of Government Property At Collectorate Office : CBI Court Sentences Three Accused Advocates

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The CBI court has sentenced three accused advocates for destructing government property at the Collectorate Office.

The Court of Special Judicial Magistrate, CBI cases, Lucknow sentenced three accused advocates namely Shri Sunil Tondon, Shri Dharmendra Mishra and Shri Sunil Bajpai to one year’s Imprisonment with total fine of Rs. 7,500/- in a case related to destruction of government property at Collectorate Office, Etawah (UP) and causing hurt to Govt. servants by unruly behaviors on 15.09.2000.

CBI registered the instant case, on the basis of an order of the Allahabad High Court passed in Crl. Misc. (PIL), by taking over investigation of case crime no. 303/2000 of PS Civil Lines, Etawah (UP).

After investigation, CBI filed charge-sheet on 28.06.2011 against accused Veerendra Singh Yadav, Avneesh Chauhan, Sunil Tandon, Sunil Bajpai and Dharmendra Mishra u/s 143, 147, 323 r/w 149 and 332 of IPC and against Veerendra Singh Yadav  u/s 153 IPC also.

During trial 2 accused Avneesh Chauhan and Veerendra Yadav died and proceedings against them were abated.

After trial, the Court found the remaining accused guilty and sentenced them accordingly.

Click Here To Read Press Release

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Rs. 5K Recovery Alone Can’t Prove Bribery Without Proof Of Demand And Acceptance: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has set aside the corruption conviction of a government employee accused...
Direct Tax

Commercial Property Can’t Bar ₹2.63 Crore Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh, has held that a commercial property cannot...
GST

Missing Return E-Way Bill: ₹20.13 Lakh GST Penalty Cut To ₹25,000 For Duty-Paid Imports: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has set aside a penalty...
Indirect Taxes

Failure To Claim Exemption In Returns Cannot Defeat Service Tax Refund: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has directed the department...

More like this

Supreme Court

Rs. 5K Recovery Alone Can’t Prove Bribery Without Proof Of Demand And Acceptance: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has set aside the corruption conviction of a government employee accused...
Direct Tax

Commercial Property Can’t Bar ₹2.63 Crore Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh, has held that a commercial property cannot...
GST

Missing Return E-Way Bill: ₹20.13 Lakh GST Penalty Cut To ₹25,000 For Duty-Paid Imports: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has set aside a penalty...