Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsCustodial Torture | Rajasthan High Court Warns of Summoning DGP if Action...

Custodial Torture | Rajasthan High Court Warns of Summoning DGP if Action Against Erring Officer Is Unsatisfactory

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur has warned that it will summon the Director General of Police (DGFT), Rajasthan, if the steps taken by the State authorities against an erring police officer in a custodial torture case are found to be unsatisfactory, underscoring its serious concern over rising incidents of custodial violence.

The bench of Justice Farjand Ali expressed deep concern over the alleged conduct of the police officer involved, describing the act as “diabolical” and akin to behavior in a “beast-like fashion.” The Court made it clear that it intends to closely monitor the progress of the inquiry and the action taken against the officer concerned. 

The matter arose in a criminal writ petition where the petitioner alleged custodial torture of her brother. 

To Read Complete facts Read: Detenue ‘assaulted, Forced To Drink Urine’: Rajasthan HC Orders Probe Into Alleged Police-Doctor Collusion

The Court granted a short accommodation to the State to complete the inquiry and directed that the matter be listed again on April 24, 2026, specifically to review the progress of the investigation into the custodial torture allegations. The Court also referred to its earlier observations recorded on February 19, 2026, where detailed facts of the alleged incident had already been noted. 

Expressing broader concern, the High Court observed that incidents of custodial torture have become “rampant” in recent times, often resulting in serious injuries and, in some cases, even deaths within jail premises. The Court indicated that it would also examine what systemic measures have been taken by the State Police to curb such incidents and prevent recurrence. 

Custodial torture is not just an offence against an individual, but a direct assault on society and the rule of law.

On the evidentiary front, the Court took on record key materials, including the victim’s statement recorded before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udaipur, and the medicolegal report prepared by a duly constituted medical board of RNT Medical College, Udaipur, detailing the injuries sustained by the victim. 

Importantly, the Court issued a stern warning to the State authorities, stating that if the steps taken are found to be unsatisfactory, it may summon the Director General of Police, Rajasthan, to personally appear before the Court and file an affidavit explaining the failure to take action against the erring officer. 

The case is now scheduled for further hearing on April 24, 2026, where the Court is expected to scrutinize both the progress of the inquiry and the accountability of the police authorities in addressing the serious allegations of custodial torture.

Case Details

Case Title: Noreen Bano Versus State Of Rajasthan 

Case No.: S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 579/2026

Date: 15/04/2026

Counsel For  Petitioner: Harshit Yadav and Kusha Sharma

Counsel For Respondent: N.S. Chandawat, Dy. GA

Read More: Loan EMIs Can’t Reduce Husband’s Duty to Maintain Wife: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...

DRI | 3 Years’ Custody and Slow Trial Alone Can’t Override NDPS Bail Bar in Commercial Quantity Case: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused regular bail to a 70-year-old man accused of...

Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case Involving Alleged Routing of Chinese Steel Pipes Through Thailand: Mumbai Court Grants Bail

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted bail to a businessman...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...

DRI | 3 Years’ Custody and Slow Trial Alone Can’t Override NDPS Bail Bar in Commercial Quantity Case: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused regular bail to a 70-year-old man accused of...