Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsDetenue ‘Assaulted, Forced to Drink Urine’: Rajasthan HC Orders Probe into Alleged...

Detenue ‘Assaulted, Forced to Drink Urine’: Rajasthan HC Orders Probe into Alleged Police-Doctor Collusion

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Rajasthan High Court has taken serious note of grave allegations of custodial torture where a Detenue was ‘Assaulted and Forced to Drink Urine’ in a criminal writ petition filed by Noreen Bano, directing an independent investigation, constitution of a medical board, and preservation of CCTV footage in connection with FIR registered at Salumber Police Station.

The bench of Justice Farjand Ali has observed that the sanctity of a judicial order lies not merely in its pronouncement but in the fairness and transparency of the process adopted. The Court emphasized that allegations of such nature, if proven true, strike at the core of constitutional guarantees and the dignity of an individual in custody.

The petitioner alleged that her 18-year-old brother was subjected to “beast-like torture” while in police custody. Serious accusations were levelled against Inspector Hemant Chouhan, the investigating officer, including claims that the detenue was brutally assaulted and forced to consume urine.

Mr. Harshit Yadav along with Ms. Kusha Sharma, the counsels on behalf of the petitioner argued that the Medical Officer at the local hospital acted in collusion with the investigating officer and prepared a false medical examination report showing “nil injuries,” despite visible bodily injuries on the accused.

When the accused was produced before the Judicial Magistrate along with the purported clean medical report, he reportedly displayed fresh injuries to highlight the alleged falsity of the report. Although the Magistrate directed a further medical examination, the same Medical Officer was assigned the task, raising concerns of bias.

Court Flags Collusion and Stresses Fair Process

Observing that specific allegations of connivance had been made against both the Investigating Officer and the Medical Officer, the Court underscored that judicial propriety demands entrustment of further proceedings to independent authorities in such circumstances.

The Court issued a series of stringent directions.

Firstly, the Superintendent of Police, Salumber, was directed to personally examine the matter and transfer the investigation to an officer not below the rank of RPS.

Secondly, the statement of the detenue is to be recorded by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udaipur, within 12 hours, ensuring it is made free from any coercion or undue influence.

Thirdly, inspector Hemant Chouhan has been ordered to be kept away from any further proceedings related to the case to prevent interference.

Fourthly, the accused is to be immediately referred to R.N.T. Medical College & Hospital, where a Medical Board comprising three senior doctors will conduct a comprehensive examination. The Board has been directed to detail the size, type, nature, and probable cause of any injuries and submit its report within three days.

Fifthly, the CCTV footage of the relevant period from the police station and nearby areas is to be preserved and secured for detailed analysis.

Lastly, senior police authorities, including the Inspector General of Police, Udaipur Range, have been directed to ensure immediate and effective compliance with the Court’s order.

Case Details

Case Title: Noreen Bano Versus State of Rajasthan

Citation: JURISHOUR-31-HC-2026(Raj) 

Case No.: S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 579/2026

Date: 19/02/2026

Counsel For Petitioner: Advocates Harshit Yadav and Kusha Sharma

Counsel For Respondent: Deepak Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG

Read More: OIO Service On Assessee Not Complete If Dept. Fails To Prove Service: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Registration Cancellation Quashed Over Missing Verification Report And Unexplained Retrospective Effect: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has set aside an order cancelling a firm’s GST registration...

Internal Departmental Delays Can’t Extend GST Refund Appeal Deadline: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has dismissed the department’s appeal in a dispute involving recovery...

GST Officer Blocks Rs. 1.61 Crore ITC Beyond His Powers; Allahabad High Court Orders Review Of Similar Cases

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Commissioner, State Tax, to examine whether officers...

GST Recovery Put on Hold as Allahabad HC Flags Substantial Question of Law Over Portal Upload, Communication of Orders

The Allahabad High Court has taken serious note of concerns relating to the chronology...

More like this

GST Registration Cancellation Quashed Over Missing Verification Report And Unexplained Retrospective Effect: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has set aside an order cancelling a firm’s GST registration...

Internal Departmental Delays Can’t Extend GST Refund Appeal Deadline: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has dismissed the department’s appeal in a dispute involving recovery...

GST Officer Blocks Rs. 1.61 Crore ITC Beyond His Powers; Allahabad High Court Orders Review Of Similar Cases

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Commissioner, State Tax, to examine whether officers...