Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsBribery Allegations in Bail Cases: Delhi Special Judge Transferred 

Bribery Allegations in Bail Cases: Delhi Special Judge Transferred 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A special judge in Delhi has been transferred after the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) raised serious allegations involving bribery in exchange for granting bail. The judge, who previously handled cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act at the Rouse Avenue Court, is now under scrutiny for allegedly facilitating bail orders in return for large sums of money.

Bribery Complaints Trigger Investigation

The issue came to light in January 2025, when the ACB received multiple complaints from families of accused individuals. The complainants alleged that the judge, along with a court staffer, sought bribes ranging from ₹15 lakh to ₹1 crore for favorable bail decisions.

The Delhi High Court was alerted and initially reviewed the matter. Although the court found the available material insufficient for disciplinary action at the time, it authorized the ACB to continue investigating.

FIR Filed Against Court Clerk

Following further inquiries, the ACB lodged an FIR on May 16, 2025 against the concerned court reader (clerk) under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The FIR references a communication made by the Delhi High Court that paved the way for deeper investigation.

Judge Transferred Shortly After FIR

Just four days after the FIR, the Delhi High Court transferred the judge on May 20, raising questions about administrative action taken in response to the bribery allegations. While the court has not cited the bribery accusations as the reason for the transfer, the timing has drawn significant public and media attention.

Investigation Ongoing, No Charges Yet

As of now, no charges have been officially framed against the judge, and the case is still under investigation. The ACB is reportedly examining call records, digital communications, and witness statements to establish the full scope of the alleged misconduct.

Read More: GSTAT Interview Questions

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...

Why do GST Dept. Recover ITC From Buyers When Suppliers Fail to Deposit Tax?

A purchaser may hold a valid tax invoice, receive the goods or services, pay...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...