Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationMCA Notifies Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2025; New GNL-1...

MCA Notifies Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2025; New GNL-1 Form to Be Effective from July 14, 2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has notified Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2025 to amend the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014. 

The  Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2025  will come into effect from July 14, 2025.

The key highlight of the amendment is the replacement of the existing Form GNL-1 with a revised format. 

The new GNL-1 form standardizes the process of filing applications with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) for various purposes, including Compounding of offences under the Companies Act, 2013; Extension of the deadline for holding the Annual General Meeting (AGM) by up to three months; Filing of schemes related to arrangement or amalgamation; and  Other miscellaneous applications under specific sections of the Act.

The revised form requires detailed disclosures including the purpose of filing, applicant and company details, notice references (if any), period and reasons for default (if applicable), and explanations for delays. It also includes specific provisions to declare ongoing investigations by enforcement agencies like SFIO.

A significant compliance feature introduced is the mandatory digital signature by authorized personnel and a certification from a practicing professional — such as a Chartered Accountant, Company Secretary, or Cost Accountant — affirming the authenticity and accuracy of the submission.

The amendment has been introduced under the powers conferred by Sections 396, 398, 399, 403, and 404 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Section 469.

Notification Details

Notification No. F. No. 01/16/2013 CL-V 

Date: 03/06/2025

Read More: CBDT Notifies Maharashtra WCD Secretary For Income Tax Data Sharing To Identify Beneficiaries Under Mukhyamantri Mazi Ladki Bahin Yojana

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 16, 2026.GSTGST REVOCATION ORDER QUASHED AFTER...

CBIC Circulars Not Binding On GSTAT; Inverted Duty Refund Available Where Inputs And Finished Goods Are Distinct: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Money Received by Intermediary Not Enough to Prove Public Servant Accepted Bribe: Supreme Court Acquits RPF Officer

The Supreme Court has acquitted a former Divisional Security Commissioner of the Railway Protection...

Loan Recovery Can’t Become “Instrument of Oppression”: Supreme Court Awards Rs.10 Lakh Compensation for Midnight Repossession of Truck

The Supreme Court has strongly deprecated the forcible repossession of a borrower’s truck by...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 16, 2026.GSTGST REVOCATION ORDER QUASHED AFTER...

CBIC Circulars Not Binding On GSTAT; Inverted Duty Refund Available Where Inputs And Finished Goods Are Distinct: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Money Received by Intermediary Not Enough to Prove Public Servant Accepted Bribe: Supreme Court Acquits RPF Officer

The Supreme Court has acquitted a former Divisional Security Commissioner of the Railway Protection...