HomeNotificationGovt. Announces Rs.1,500 Crore Incentive Scheme to Boost Low-Value BHIM-UPI Transactions

Govt. Announces Rs.1,500 Crore Incentive Scheme to Boost Low-Value BHIM-UPI Transactions

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has introduced a new Incentive Scheme for the Promotion of Low-Value BHIM-UPI Transactions (Person to Merchant – P2M) for FY 2024-25, with an estimated outlay of Rs. 1,500 crore. 

This initiative aims to further accelerate digital payment adoption, particularly among small merchants and consumers, ensuring seamless and cost-free transactions.

Key Highlights of the BHIM-UPI Incentive Scheme

  • Scheme Duration: April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025.
  • Transaction Limit: Covers UPI (P2M) transactions up to ₹2,000.
  • Target Beneficiaries: Small merchants with an annual turnover up to ₹20 lakh (as per RBI guidelines).
  • Incentive Structure:
    • 0.15% per transaction will be provided to acquiring banks promoting eligible low-value transactions.
    • Quarterly disbursement of incentives, with 80% of the claim paid unconditionally.
    • The remaining 20% is linked to technical efficiency:
      • 10% is payable if the technical decline rate is below 0.75%.
      • 10% is payable if the system uptime exceeds 99.5%.

Why Does This Scheme Matters?

With India witnessing an exponential rise in digital transactions—from 2,071 crore in FY 2017-18 to 18,737 crore in FY 2023-24—this scheme aims to sustain momentum by targeting untapped markets and sectors.

Consumers will continue enjoying seamless, round-the-clock UPI services at zero cost, while small merchants benefit from a boost in digital payments without additional financial burden. The Department of Financial Services (DFS), in collaboration with NPCI, will monitor the scheme’s impact and adjust implementation guidelines as needed.

This initiative aligns with India’s vision of a cashless economy and strengthens the country’s digital payment infrastructure.

Notification Details

Notification No. F. No. 5/11/2024-DP-DFS

Date: 21/03/2025

Read More: Delhi High Court Judge’s Residence Fire: DFS Says ‘No Cash Found,’ But Mystery Deepens

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...

GST | Allahabad High Court Restores Opportunity to Reply in S. 74 Proceedings, Quashes Adjudication Order Passed Without Hearing

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order passed against an...

More like this

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...