HomeOther LawsDelhi High Court Judge's Residence Fire: DFS Says 'No Cash Found,' But...

Delhi High Court Judge’s Residence Fire: DFS Says ‘No Cash Found,’ But Mystery Deepens

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The recent fire incident at the official residence of Delhi High Court Justice Yashwant Varma has turned into a full-blown controversy, with more questions than answers. Even as Delhi Fire Services (DFS) Chief Atul Garg stated that no cash was found during the firefighting operation, reports suggest otherwise, with a Supreme Court collegium initiating an inquiry and recommending Justice Varma’s transfer to the Allahabad High Court.

The blaze broke out at Justice Varma’s Lutyens Delhi residence on the night of March 14, with the control room receiving an emergency call at 11.35 pm. Two fire tenders were dispatched, reaching the location by 11.43 pm. According to Garg, the fire, which had engulfed a store room stocked with stationery and domestic items, was controlled within 15 minutes.

While there were no casualties, the incident took a mysterious turn when allegations surfaced that a large stash of cash was discovered at the site. However, DFS Chief Garg categorically denied the claims. “Our firefighters did not find any cash during their firefighting operation,” he told PTI. The fire department, he added, had duly informed the police after dousing the flames and left the spot soon after.

Despite this, the Supreme Court collegium has reportedly launched an inquiry into the alleged discovery of cash, leading to Varma’s sudden recommendation for transfer to the Allahabad High Court. This move has sparked outrage among members of the Allahabad High Court Bar Association, who released a strongly worded statement rejecting the transfer, saying, “We are not a dustbin for judicial controversies.”

The lack of clarity surrounding the alleged cash haul has raised several pressing questions. If no cash was found, as DFS claims, why was Justice Varma suddenly repatriated to his parent High Court? Why has the video footage recorded by fire department personnel not been made public? If money was indeed discovered, how much was it, who placed it there, how was it transported, and why was the matter kept under wraps for a week?

Adding to the intrigue, investigative agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Income Tax Department, and Delhi Police have remained conspicuously silent. Their inaction in probing such a serious allegation has fueled speculation of a cover-up or political maneuvering at play.

As the judicial corridors buzz with unanswered questions, the lack of transparency surrounding the incident only deepens the mystery. Whether this controversy will be buried or lead to a full-fledged investigation remains to be seen.

Read More: Justice Yashwant Varma’s Role In Simbhaoli Sugars Case; Past Financial Dealings Under Scrutiny After Cash Seizure

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 22, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT ISSUES NOTICE IN...

Parts Must Be Classified With Parent Printers: Customs Dept. Drops ₹23.63 Lakh Duty Demand on Inkjet Printheads [READ ORDER]

Mumbai Customs has dropped a customs duty demand of ₹23.63 lakh against M/s. Mehta...

Appeal Filed Within 21 Days Must Be Heard Without Limitation Objection: Gauhati High Court Extends Interim Protection in GST Dispute

The Gauhati High Court has granted further interim protection in a GST dispute involving...

GSTAT Special Bench to Decide Whether Delay Beyond S. 107 Time Limit Can Be Condoned

The Special Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has decided...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 22, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT ISSUES NOTICE IN...

Parts Must Be Classified With Parent Printers: Customs Dept. Drops ₹23.63 Lakh Duty Demand on Inkjet Printheads [READ ORDER]

Mumbai Customs has dropped a customs duty demand of ₹23.63 lakh against M/s. Mehta...

Appeal Filed Within 21 Days Must Be Heard Without Limitation Objection: Gauhati High Court Extends Interim Protection in GST Dispute

The Gauhati High Court has granted further interim protection in a GST dispute involving...