HomeNotificationIBBI Tightens Insolvency Disclosure Norms in Fifth Amendment Regulations, 2025

IBBI Tightens Insolvency Disclosure Norms in Fifth Amendment Regulations, 2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Fifth Amendment) Regulations, 2025, bringing significant changes aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability in the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP).

The amendment mandates stricter disclosure of “avoidance transactions” and bars their post-facto inclusion in resolution plans unless previously disclosed. These changes amend the original 2016 regulations under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.

Mandatory Disclosure of Avoidance Transactions:

Regulation 36(1) now includes the clause “and its subsequent updates thereof,” emphasizing continuous updates to the information memorandum after the insolvency commencement date.

A new clause (ha) under Regulation 36(2) requires disclosure of all identified avoidance transactions (such as preferential, undervalued, extortionate, or fraudulent transactions) and related filings before the Adjudicating Authority.

Restrictions on Assignments in Resolution Plans:

Regulation 38 has been amended to insert sub-regulation (2A), which prohibits the assignment of avoidance transactions or fraudulent/wrongful trading in resolution plans if:

(a) they were not disclosed in the information memorandum, and

(b) not communicated to prospective resolution applicants before the final submission deadline.

However, this restriction does not apply to resolution plans already submitted to the Adjudicating Authority before the commencement of the Fifth Amendment Regulations.

Notification Details

Notification No. : F. No. IBBI/2025-26/GN/REG128

Date: 04/07/2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

State Can’t Unilaterally Decide Breach and Bar Legal Remedies: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award

The Supreme Court has held that a State authority cannot unilaterally determine breach of...

Developments in Parallel Proceedings—Such as Insolvency Resolutions or OTS Approvals—Can’t Be Used to Reopen Concluded SLP: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that subsequent developments in parallel proceedings, including insolvency resolutions...

No Right to Appointment from Unfilled Vacancy Due to Non-Joining: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that a candidate cannot claim appointment to a government...

Relaxation in TET Doesn’t Bar Reserved Candidates from Open Category Selection Based on Merit: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that candidates belonging to reserved categories who avail relaxation...

More like this

State Can’t Unilaterally Decide Breach and Bar Legal Remedies: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award

The Supreme Court has held that a State authority cannot unilaterally determine breach of...

Developments in Parallel Proceedings—Such as Insolvency Resolutions or OTS Approvals—Can’t Be Used to Reopen Concluded SLP: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that subsequent developments in parallel proceedings, including insolvency resolutions...

No Right to Appointment from Unfilled Vacancy Due to Non-Joining: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that a candidate cannot claim appointment to a government...