Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationFinMin Notifies 0.1% Concessional Fee for Guarantees under NaBFID Rules Amendment

FinMin Notifies 0.1% Concessional Fee for Guarantees under NaBFID Rules Amendment

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has notified amendments to the National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development (NaBFID) General Rules, 2022, providing for a concessional rate of fees on government guarantees for specific foreign borrowings. 

The National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development General (Amendment) Rules, 2025, were published in the Official Gazette on Wednesday.

As per the notification, a new Rule 10 has been inserted which fixes a 0.1% concessional rate of government guarantee fees for borrowings raised by NaBFID from multilateral institutions, sovereign wealth funds, and other foreign institutions specified by the Central Government.

The rules further empower the government to reduce the concessional rate even below 0.1% for borrowings made for purposes mandated by the government. NaBFID will be required to submit a detailed request specifying the nature of borrowings, parties involved, and the intended use of funds to avail such a reduction.

The government guarantee fees will be payable at the time of obtaining the guarantee and subsequently every year on April 1. The notification also clarifies that these fees will be subject to other conditions imposed by the Central Government.

This amendment aims to make foreign borrowing by NaBFID more cost-effective and aligns with the institution’s mandate of financing large-scale infrastructure projects in India.

The original NaBFID General Rules, 2022, were published on January 28, 2022, and were previously amended on July 15, 2022.

Notification Details

Notification No. F. No. 15/10/2021

Date:  30th July, 2025

Read More: GST Registration Cancelled Retrospectively, No IGST Refund Until Restored: Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 25K Cost On Exporter

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...

S. 106 Can’t Replace Proof of Guilt: Supreme Court Acquits Man in Kidnapping-Murder Case, Calls Investigation ‘Shoddy’

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man convicted in a kidnapping and murder case...

More like this

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...