HomeNotificationDGFT Extends Export Obligation Period for Advance Authorisation Holders Importing Products under...

DGFT Extends Export Obligation Period for Advance Authorisation Holders Importing Products under QCOs

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, has announced amendments to the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2023, offering relief to Advance Authorisation (AA) holders, Export Oriented Units (EOUs), and Special Economic Zones (SEZs).

Through Notification No. 28/2025-26, issued on August 28, 2025, the government has revised Para 2.03(A)(i)(g) of FTP 2023, which governs export obligations related to imports subjected to mandatory Quality Control Orders (QCOs).

Earlier, the export obligation (EO) period for imports under Advance Authorisation was restricted to 180 days from the date of clearance of consignments in respect of QCO-exempted chemical products notified by the Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals (DCPC).

Under the new amendment, this restrictive clause has been removed, and the EO period has been uniformly extended to 18 months for all Advance Authorisation holders importing products under mandatory QCOs. Henceforth, the export obligation for such authorisations will follow the provisions outlined in Para 4.40 of the Handbook of Procedures, aligning all AA holders under a common compliance framework.

EO Period Extended: From the existing 6 months to 18 months for imports subjected to QCOs under DCPC.

Simplification of Compliance: The earlier restriction of 180 days for certain chemical products has been removed, reducing procedural hurdles.

Greater Flexibility: Exporters now have a longer timeline to meet their obligations, which is expected to ease compliance pressure and boost export competitiveness.

Read More: FIR Filed Against Hyundai Brand Ambassadors Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 11, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 11, 2026.GSTDGGI OFFICERS CAN’T SEIZE CASH...

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Order Granting Limited Interim Protection in Oppression–Mismanagement Dispute

The Supreme Court of India has upheld an order of the National Company Law...

Parties Can’t Challenge Arbitral Tribunal’s Constitution After Acquiescence: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a party cannot belatedly challenge the constitution of...

Procedural Lapse U/s 157 CrPC Not Fatal to Prosecution: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the conviction and life sentence of 4 men in...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 11, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 11, 2026.GSTDGGI OFFICERS CAN’T SEIZE CASH...

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Order Granting Limited Interim Protection in Oppression–Mismanagement Dispute

The Supreme Court of India has upheld an order of the National Company Law...

Parties Can’t Challenge Arbitral Tribunal’s Constitution After Acquiescence: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a party cannot belatedly challenge the constitution of...