Export Of Non-Basmati Rice Allowed Subject To Registration Of Contracts With APEDA: DGFT

HomeNotificationExport Of Non-Basmati Rice Allowed Subject To Registration Of Contracts With APEDA:...

Export Of Non-Basmati Rice Allowed Subject To Registration Of Contracts With APEDA: DGFT

Notification

Published on

25/09/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Export Of Non-Basmati Rice Allowed Subject To Registration Of Contracts With APEDA: DGFT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has notified that the export of non-basmati rice is allowed subject to registration of contracts with Agricultural and Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA).

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), under the Ministry of Commerce & Industry, issued Notification No. 33/2025-26 on Tuesday, prescribing new conditions under the ITC (HS) 2022, Chapter 10, Schedule II (Export Policy).

Non-basmati rice falling under ITC (HS) codes 1006 3011, 1006 3019, 1006 3091, 1006 3099, and 1006 4000. Exports remain classified as “Free”. However, exports are allowed only upon registration of export contracts with APEDA.

Notification Details

Notification No. 33/2025-26

Date: 24/09/2025

Click Here To Read Notification

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Non-Basmati Rice

Export Of Non-Basmati Rice Allowed Subject To Registration Of Contracts With APEDA: DGFT

Notification Details

Latest articles

No Penalty for Monthly Liquor Quota Shortfall if Annual Minimum Guaranteed Quantity Is Fully Achieved: Supreme Court

Mere Interpretation of ‘Input Service’ Can’t Trigger Extended Limitation Under CENVAT Law: CESTAT

End-Use in Motor Vehicles Can’t Override Specific Customs Tariff Classification for Differential Gears: CESTAT

GST on Corporate Guarantees for Pre-2023 Period Faces Judicial Scrutiny: Madras High Court Stays Demand Orders

More like this

No Penalty for Monthly Liquor Quota Shortfall if Annual Minimum Guaranteed Quantity Is Fully Achieved: Supreme Court

Mere Interpretation of ‘Input Service’ Can’t Trigger Extended Limitation Under CENVAT Law: CESTAT

End-Use in Motor Vehicles Can’t Override Specific Customs Tariff Classification for Differential Gears: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories