Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Upholds Penalty On Philips Electronics In Excise Undervaluation Case

CESTAT Upholds Penalty On Philips Electronics In Excise Undervaluation Case

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
CESTAT Upholds Penalty On Philips Electronics In Excise Undervaluation Case

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld the penalty imposed on Philips Electronics India Ltd under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, in a long-running excise undervaluation dispute involving alleged related-party transactions with contract manufacturer.  The Bench of Angad Prasad (Member Judicial) dismissed the appeal…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Related Eyewitnesses’ Testimony Requires Closer Scrutiny When It Bears ‘Ring of Falsity’: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted two persons convicted of murder after finding material discrepancies...
Columns

ONE CLOCK. DIFFERENT SUNSETS – THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME AND SEQUENCE IN NDPS INVESTIGATIONS

The Article "ONE CLOCK. DIFFERENT SUNSETS - THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME AND SEQUENCE IN...
Supreme Court

Fake PhD Can’t Invalidate Appointment When UGC-NET Qualification Independently Satisfies Eligibility: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has declined to disturb the appointment of an Assistant Professor whose...
Supreme Court

Mere Absence of Specific Overt Act Cannot Exonerate Member of Armed Unlawful Assembly: Supreme Court Restores Murder Convictions

The Supreme Court has restored the conviction of two accused in a 2004 murder...

More like this

Supreme Court

Related Eyewitnesses’ Testimony Requires Closer Scrutiny When It Bears ‘Ring of Falsity’: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted two persons convicted of murder after finding material discrepancies...
Columns

ONE CLOCK. DIFFERENT SUNSETS – THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME AND SEQUENCE IN NDPS INVESTIGATIONS

The Article "ONE CLOCK. DIFFERENT SUNSETS - THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME AND SEQUENCE IN...
Supreme Court

Fake PhD Can’t Invalidate Appointment When UGC-NET Qualification Independently Satisfies Eligibility: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has declined to disturb the appointment of an Assistant Professor whose...