Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationCBIC Finalises All-India Seniority List for Promotion of Administrative Officers to Chief...

CBIC Finalises All-India Seniority List for Promotion of Administrative Officers to Chief Accounts Officer

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), under the Ministry of Finance, has released the Final Integrated All-India Seniority List (AISL) of Administrative Officers (AOs) of Central GST, Central Excise, and Directorates for the period January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020.

This move comes as part of preparations for the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) that will consider promotions of AOs to the coveted post of Chief Accounts Officer (CAO) in Group ‘A’ Gazetted cadre for the vacancy year 2026.

Background and Process

A draft AISL was earlier circulated on 17 February 2023 for comments and objections from Zonal Cadre Controlling Authorities (CCAs). Following due consultation, examination of representations, and rectification of discrepancies, the final list has now been notified and placed on the CBIC and DGHRD websites.

The seniority list has been structured in line with DoPT guidelines, with weightage given to:

  • Date of regular appointment as AO,
  • Zonal relative seniority,
  • Length of service in the feeder grade, and
  • Date of birth (to resolve ties when service details coincide).

Impact of the Seniority List

The final AISL will serve as the foundation for promotions to CAO posts across GST formations and Directorates. These promotions are a crucial part of the career progression of officers, who play a vital role in tax administration and financial accountability within CBIC.

Officers who have retired, taken voluntary retirement (VRS), or expired during the relevant period are also reflected in the list, ensuring transparency and record-keeping for the cadre.

Nationwide Coverage

The list consolidates seniority data from all major GST and Central Excise Zones across India, including Bengaluru, Bhopal, Bhubaneswar, Chandigarh, Chennai, Cochin, Delhi, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai, Ranchi, Shillong, Vadodara, Goa, Guwahati, and DGPM (Delhi).

For instance, officers like K.K. Sindhumol (Thiruvananthapuram Zone), Ram Asrey (CBN), Nayana S. Bhandari (Mumbai Zone), and A.A. Pathan (Vadodara Zone) feature prominently at the top of the seniority chart, reflecting their appointment timelines and service history.

Official Statement

Issuing the memorandum, Sunil Tated, Principal Additional Director General (HRM-I), DGHRD, noted:

“While every care has been taken to ensure accuracy in preparing the AISL, any inadvertent error or omission may be brought to the notice of this office with supporting documents.”

Next Steps

The finalisation of the AISL clears the way for the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) to convene and recommend promotions to Chief Accounts Officer (CAO) for the 2026 vacancy year.

Once approved, this will significantly strengthen the administrative capacity of CBIC, ensuring greater efficiency in tax governance and cadre management.

Read More: Why Individual Lawyers Get GST Exemption—And CAs Don’t?

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...