HomeNotificationAdjudication in S. 70 Summons Cases to Be Handled by Jurisdictional Officers:...

Adjudication in S. 70 Summons Cases to Be Handled by Jurisdictional Officers: MP GST Dept.

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Madhya Pradesh, has issued fresh directions regarding the handling of cases initiated under Section 70 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 stating that the adjudication in summons cases to be handled by jurisdictional officers.

The circular modifies an earlier order issued on January 12, 2024 and lays down a revised mechanism for adjudication and recovery in summons-related cases.

The communication, issued from the Office of the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Madhya Pradesh, is addressed to all Divisional Joint Commissioners and officers of the Anti-Evasion Bureau across the State.

Under the earlier circular dated January 12, 2024, Anti-Evasion Bureau officers conducting investigations under Section 70 were completing summons proceedings and thereafter allocating cases for adjudication under provisions such as Sections 73, 74, 74A, 122 and 127 to officers other than those involved in the original investigation.

The Commissioner noted that adjudication cases arising from summons proceedings were being assigned to different officers, creating administrative and procedural challenges.

To address these issues, the Department has now revised the process and introduced a more centralized framework for adjudication.

Adjudication Cases to be Assigned to Concerned Circle and Divisional Officers

The revised directions provide that once proceedings under Section 70 are completed, cases requiring adjudication shall be allocated to the designated officers posted in the concerned Circle and Divisional Offices.

This marks a shift from the earlier practice where such matters could be assigned to other officers after the investigation stage.

Allocation to Follow Monetary Jurisdiction Norms

The circular further mandates that the allocation of adjudication cases shall be undertaken by the Divisional Joint Commissioner in accordance with the monetary limits prescribed under the Department’s adjudication circular and jurisdictional guidelines.

The move is expected to ensure uniformity and consistency in the handling of GST disputes across Madhya Pradesh.

Recovery Proceedings to Remain with Enforcement Officers

One of the most notable changes introduced by the circular relates to recovery proceedings.

The Commissioner has clarified that after completion of summons proceedings, all statutory actions connected with adjudication and the consequential recovery of tax demand will continue to remain the responsibility of the officers who originally handled the enforcement proceedings.

This means that while adjudication may be allocated according to jurisdictional norms, the enforcement machinery that initiated the proceedings will continue to oversee recovery-related actions arising from the adjudication order.

Objective of the Circular

The revised framework appears to be aimed at:

  • Ensuring accountability in GST enforcement matters.
  • Reducing procedural delays in adjudication and recovery.
  • Establishing a clear division of responsibilities between adjudicating authorities and enforcement officers.
  • Bringing greater consistency in the processing of cases initiated through summons proceedings under Section 70.

Importance for Taxpayers

Section 70 of the GST Act empowers tax authorities to summon persons whose attendance is considered necessary during an inquiry. Such proceedings often lead to adjudication under Sections 73 or 74 relating to tax demands, penalties, and alleged tax shortfalls.

Membership Required to Access Circular & Copy

To view the complete Circular and Download Circular Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Haryana GST Dept. Directs Physical Intimation of SCNs and Demand Orders By Post Despite Portal Service

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

US-Iran War Ends | Strait of Hormuz Reopenes

A major diplomatic breakthrough may be on the horizon as U.S. President Donald Trump...

Ownership Not a Condition for CENVAT Credit on Capital Goods: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit on Leadership Fee Cannot Be Denied by Artificially Splitting Composite Turnkey Contract: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Haryana GST Dept. Directs Physical Intimation of SCNs and Demand Orders By Post Despite Portal Service

In a move aimed at improving communication with taxpayers, the Haryana Excise and Taxation...

More like this

US-Iran War Ends | Strait of Hormuz Reopenes

A major diplomatic breakthrough may be on the horizon as U.S. President Donald Trump...

Ownership Not a Condition for CENVAT Credit on Capital Goods: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit on Leadership Fee Cannot Be Denied by Artificially Splitting Composite Turnkey Contract: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...