Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesVisa Facilitation Services Provided Directly To Travellers Not Taxable Under Service Tax...

Visa Facilitation Services Provided Directly To Travellers Not Taxable Under Service Tax As BAS: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Visa Facilitation Services Provided Directly To Travellers Not Taxable Under Service Tax As BAS: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that visa facilitation services rendered directly to individuals travelling abroad are not liable to service tax under the category of “Business Auxiliary Service” under the Finance Act, 1994.  The coram comprising Ajayan T.V. (Judicial Member) and M. Ajit Kumar (Technical Member)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Direct Tax

Income Tax Penalty Proceedings Should Not Be Completed While Quantum Appeal Is Pending: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has set aside an income tax penalty order passed under...
GST

GST ITC Depends On Supplier’s Tax Payment: Rajasthan High Court Upholds S. 16(2)(c)

The Rajasthan High Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the...
Columns

UPI Payments Above Rs. 2,000 to Attract 0.4% MDR From 15 October, 2026

The National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) has announced a Merchant Discount Rate (MDR)...
GST

1 Day Delay in GST Detention Notice Vitiates Entire Proceedings: J&K and Ladakh High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has set aside GST detention and...

More like this

Direct Tax

Income Tax Penalty Proceedings Should Not Be Completed While Quantum Appeal Is Pending: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has set aside an income tax penalty order passed under...
GST

GST ITC Depends On Supplier’s Tax Payment: Rajasthan High Court Upholds S. 16(2)(c)

The Rajasthan High Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the...
Columns

UPI Payments Above Rs. 2,000 to Attract 0.4% MDR From 15 October, 2026

The National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) has announced a Merchant Discount Rate (MDR)...