Uno Minda Faces Rs. 52.97 Lakh Customs Demand Over HSN Code Dispute; Company to Challenge Order

Uno Minda Limited has received a formal order from the Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-II (Import), citing alleged misclassification of Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN) codes on certain imported goods. 

The order, delivered to the company on July 10, 2025, around 10:30 A.M. (IST), includes a total financial demand of Rs. 52.97 lakh, comprising a penalty of Rs. 42.97 lakh and a redemption fine of Rs. 10 lakh.

Breakdown of Customs Demand

According to the details of the order, the company has already paid and accounted for a differential customs duty of ₹42.97 lakh. However, the following liabilities remain outstanding:

ParticularsAmount (₹)Status
Differential Duty42,97,510Deposited
Interest (as per Section 28AA)As applicablePending
Penalty42,97,510Pending
Redemption Fine10,00,000Pending
Total (Penalty + Fine)52,97,510Pending

The action arises from alleged violations related to the incorrect classification of HSN codes, which are globally recognized identifiers used to categorize traded products. Such misclassifications may lead to inaccuracies in duty calculation and payment.

Company Response

Uno Minda has indicated that it will contest the order, asserting that its position is supported by merit and regulatory interpretation. The company emphasized that it does not anticipate any material impact on its operations or financial performance from the current development.

“We are evaluating legal remedies and intend to challenge the order before the appropriate authority. We are confident in our stance and do not expect this to affect our business or financial position materially,” the company stated.

Regulatory Context

Disputes over HSN classification are not uncommon in international trade, as they often involve complex product specifications and evolving regulatory guidelines. Customs authorities across jurisdictions routinely audit and scrutinize import declarations to ensure compliance, particularly with HSN codes which influence applicable duty rates.

Under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, interest may also be levied on delayed payments of duty, though the precise amount in this case remains to be determined.

Market & Investor Outlook

Industry observers note that Uno Minda’s prompt disclosure and assertion of no material impact help to maintain investor confidence. As of now, the matter is expected to proceed through standard appellate channels. The company’s clear stance indicates that while the financial demand is significant in quantum, it is unlikely to disrupt its broader financial or operational activities.

Read More: Deductions and Exemptions in New Tax Regime: What Taxpayers Can Claim?

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Senior Citizens Welfare Fund Interest Rate Lowers Down to 3.35% for FY 2024–25

The Ministry of Finance has announced that deposits made under the Senior…

Supreme Court to Hear Review Petitions on ED’s Powers Under PMLA on July 31

The Supreme Court on Tuesday postponed to July 31 the hearing of…

Imported Goods Not Capital Goods Imported Under EPCG Scheme: CESTAT Upholds Confiscation By Customs Dept.

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)…

Licensed Custodianship Can’t Be Granted Along Port Authority: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)…