Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesNo Unjust Enrichment If Duty Was Not Recovered from Buyers: CESTAT Allows...

No Unjust Enrichment If Duty Was Not Recovered from Buyers: CESTAT Allows Refund to Importer

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
No Unjust Enrichment If Duty Was Not Recovered from Buyers: CESTAT Allows Refund to Importer

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed the refund claim of the importer and held that no unjust enrichment if duty was not recovered from buyers. The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) has observed that the customs duty paid by the importer during investigation was…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...
Supreme Court

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...
GST

CGST Superintendent Allegedly Caught Accepting ₹8 Lakh Bribe in Lokayukta Trap in Bengaluru

A Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Superintendent was allegedly caught accepting a bribe...
GST

GST Audit has to be only Conducted By “Proper Officer”: Uttarakhand High Court 

The Uttarakhand High Court has restrained GST authorities from taking any further action pursuant...

More like this

Supreme Court

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...
Supreme Court

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...
GST

CGST Superintendent Allegedly Caught Accepting ₹8 Lakh Bribe in Lokayukta Trap in Bengaluru

A Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Superintendent was allegedly caught accepting a bribe...