The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld the penalty of Rs. 31 lakh penalty on real estate contractors for non-registration under service tax in labour supply to builders.

The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) has observed that the appellant/contractor had received Rs. 3,02,90,638 during the period 2009-2012 and no satisfactory explanation was offered by the appellant. 

The appellants was engaged in providing “Construction of Residential Complex service services to various builders and developers, Jodhpur. Intelligence was received that the appellant was not paying service tax on the taxable services provided by them. 

During the course of investigations, itendra Panwar appeared before the Superintendent(AE), Central Excise Division, Jodhpur and stated that there company has been operating since 2011 and undertaking the work on Labour Rate contract basis. He stated that they had worked for M/s Manav Developers only and submitted a copy of the agreement. 

On completion of investigations, the department issued Show Cause dated 14.10.2014 demanding service tax of Rs.31,19,937 under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 along with interest under section 75 and proposing penalty under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. 

The Assistant Commissioner decided the matter ex-parte and issued the Order confirming demand of Rs.31,19,937 along with interest under Section 75 and penalty under section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner (Appeals) also passed the order. The appeal has been filed.

The tribunal noted that the department had examined the agreement between the appellant and M/s Manav Builders and arrived at the conclusion that the appellant had not provided material along with the labour service. This is substantiated by the Nil VAT returns filed by the appellant. Consequently, the appellant was not eligible to any abatement from the gross amount received for the services rendered by them. 

The tribunal held that no evidence has been produced in support of the appellant’s contention.

Case Details

Case Title: M/s Panwar Builders Versus Commissioner of Central Goods, Service Tax, Central Excise, Udaipur

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 53503 Of 2018

Date: 16.05.2025

Counsel For Appellant: None

Counsel For Respondent: Anand Narayan

Read More: 18% GST On Cooperative Societies if Turnover Exceeds Rs. 20 Lakh: Report

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Penalty U/S 114AA Of Customs Act Applicable Prospectively: CESTAT

The Delhi bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)…

Concessional Customs Duty To Apply On Integrated Camera Modules, Individual Components to Attract Standard BCD: FinMin

The Ministry of Finance has notified concessional customs duty to apply on…

Burden of Proof On Assessee To Prove Agricultural Nature Of Land For Capital Gains Tax Exemption: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that the burden of proof on…

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 125 Crore Service Tax Demand Against Bharti Airtel, Call Free Allowance Waiver For Employees Not Taxable

The Chandigarh Bench of Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)…