Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesSupreme Court Dismisses PIL by Customs Officer on Kolkata Airport Incident, Questions...

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL by Customs Officer on Kolkata Airport Incident, Questions Locus Standi

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a customs officer seeking an investigation into the 2019 incident at Kolkata airport involving Rujira Banerjee, wife of Trinamool Congress leader Abhishek Banerjee, and her sister Maneka Gambhir. 

The apex court questioned the locus standi of the petitioner, customs officer Raj Kumar Barthwal, and imposed a deposit requirement of Rs 10 lakh for the case to proceed.

SC Questions Locus Standi of Customs Officer

The PIL alleged that Bengal police obstructed customs officers from performing their duties when they attempted to search Rujira Banerjee and her sister upon their arrival from Bangkok. The Supreme Court, however, raised concerns over why a customs officer, rather than the customs department or the central government, had approached the court.

Justices Dipankar Datta and M.M. Sundresh directed Barthwal to deposit Rs 10 lakh as a prerequisite to continue the case, stating that the amount would be forfeited if he failed to argue his case effectively. Following this directive, Barthwal withdrew the petition.

Legal Standpoint on the PIL Dismissal

Rujira Banerjee’s counsel, Sanjay Basu, emphasized that the court’s directive underscored its cautious stance against frivolous PILs that lack substantial legal standing. The court’s decision reflects an increasing scrutiny over PILs to ensure they serve genuine public interest and are not misused for personal or political motives.

Read More: 100 Case Laws On Fake ITC Under GST [Along With Judgement Copy] – PART 3

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...