HomeIndirect TaxesSupreme Court Dismisses PIL by Customs Officer on Kolkata Airport Incident, Questions...

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL by Customs Officer on Kolkata Airport Incident, Questions Locus Standi

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a customs officer seeking an investigation into the 2019 incident at Kolkata airport involving Rujira Banerjee, wife of Trinamool Congress leader Abhishek Banerjee, and her sister Maneka Gambhir. 

The apex court questioned the locus standi of the petitioner, customs officer Raj Kumar Barthwal, and imposed a deposit requirement of Rs 10 lakh for the case to proceed.

SC Questions Locus Standi of Customs Officer

The PIL alleged that Bengal police obstructed customs officers from performing their duties when they attempted to search Rujira Banerjee and her sister upon their arrival from Bangkok. The Supreme Court, however, raised concerns over why a customs officer, rather than the customs department or the central government, had approached the court.

Justices Dipankar Datta and M.M. Sundresh directed Barthwal to deposit Rs 10 lakh as a prerequisite to continue the case, stating that the amount would be forfeited if he failed to argue his case effectively. Following this directive, Barthwal withdrew the petition.

Legal Standpoint on the PIL Dismissal

Rujira Banerjee’s counsel, Sanjay Basu, emphasized that the court’s directive underscored its cautious stance against frivolous PILs that lack substantial legal standing. The court’s decision reflects an increasing scrutiny over PILs to ensure they serve genuine public interest and are not misused for personal or political motives.

Read More: 100 Case Laws On Fake ITC Under GST [Along With Judgement Copy] – PART 3

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 June, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for June 24, 2026.GSTBOMBAY HIGH COURT ADMITS CHALLENGE...

Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside...

Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has set aside an...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 June, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for June 24, 2026.GSTBOMBAY HIGH COURT ADMITS CHALLENGE...

Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside...

Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...