Selling Goods Below Cost Doesn’t Justify Denial of ITC: Andhra Pradesh High Court

HomeIndirect TaxesSelling Goods Below Cost Doesn’t Justify Denial of ITC: Andhra Pradesh High...

Selling Goods Below Cost Doesn’t Justify Denial of ITC: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Indirect Taxes

Published on

04/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that selling goods at a price lower than their purchase cost, in compliance with government-fixed subsidised rates, cannot be a ground to deny input tax credit (ITC) under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The bench of Justice R. Raghunandan Rao and Justice T.C.D. Sekhar set…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Selling Goods

Selling Goods Below Cost Doesn’t Justify Denial of ITC: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe Into Chhattisgarh Custodial Death, Directs Rs. 25 Lakh Interim Compensation

Money Recovery Suit Barred by Limitation, Clarifies Winding-Up Proceedings Do Not Extend Limitation: Supreme Court

Composite Appeal Maintainable Where 2 Suits by Same Plaintiff Are Tried Together and Decided by Common Judgment: Supreme Court

Multi-Heading Use of Medical Laser Imagers Attracts Residuary Customs Classification Under CTH 9033 00 00: Supreme Court

More like this

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe Into Chhattisgarh Custodial Death, Directs Rs. 25 Lakh Interim Compensation

Money Recovery Suit Barred by Limitation, Clarifies Winding-Up Proceedings Do Not Extend Limitation: Supreme Court

Composite Appeal Maintainable Where 2 Suits by Same Plaintiff Are Tried Together and Decided by Common Judgment: Supreme Court

About us

Company

Categories