Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesPro-Rata, Development, Erection Charges Linked to Power Transmission Not Liable to Service...

Pro-Rata, Development, Erection Charges Linked to Power Transmission Not Liable to Service Tax: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Pro-Rata, Development, Erection Charges Linked to Power Transmission Not Liable to Service Tax: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that pro-rata charges, development charges and erection charges collected in connection with transmission of electricity are not liable to service tax, reiterating that all activities intrinsically linked to electricity transmission constitute a single exempt service under the Finance Act, 1994.  The bench…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

Commissioner’s Approval Can’t Override Rs. 20 Lakh Appeal Limit: GSTAT Dismisses Dept.’s Penalty Appeal

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has dismissed...
GST

Defective GST Notice Can’t Sustain Rs. 2.50 Crore Recredit Demand: GSTAT Orders Reconciliation Of Tax Paid Under Wrong Head

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad State Bench, has set aside...
GST

Exempt Cattle Feed Sales Alone Doesn’t Warrant ITC Reversal; Common Credit Must Be Verified: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh State Bench, has held that...
GST

GSTAT Denies 0.1% Export Concession For Drums Sent To Distilleries, Grants Partial Relief From S. 74

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh, has held that HDPE drums...

More like this

GST

Commissioner’s Approval Can’t Override Rs. 20 Lakh Appeal Limit: GSTAT Dismisses Dept.’s Penalty Appeal

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has dismissed...
GST

Defective GST Notice Can’t Sustain Rs. 2.50 Crore Recredit Demand: GSTAT Orders Reconciliation Of Tax Paid Under Wrong Head

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad State Bench, has set aside...
GST

Exempt Cattle Feed Sales Alone Doesn’t Warrant ITC Reversal; Common Credit Must Be Verified: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh State Bench, has held that...