Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesLimitation Not Applicable for Excess Service Tax Paid by Mistake: CESTAT 

Limitation Not Applicable for Excess Service Tax Paid by Mistake: CESTAT 

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that excess service tax paid inadvertently cannot be subjected to the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) has observed that  any…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

R. 96(10) Omitted Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST SCN and Consequential Orders

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice issued under Section...
Supreme Court

Disability Pension Can’t Be Denied on Hyper-Technical Grounds; Burden Shifts to Ex-Serviceman Only After 15 Years: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has dismissed a large batch of appeals filed by the Union...
GST

Rs. 97.26 Lakh ITC Demand Raised Through GST Refund Order Without Prior Show-Cause Process Stayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has stayed a ₹97,26,820 input tax credit (ITC) demand raised...
GST

GSTAT Directs Deputy Commissioner to Attend Hearing After Dept. Representatives Fail to Check Taxpayer’s Reply

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi Bench has criticised departmental representatives for appearing at...

More like this

GST

R. 96(10) Omitted Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST SCN and Consequential Orders

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice issued under Section...
Supreme Court

Disability Pension Can’t Be Denied on Hyper-Technical Grounds; Burden Shifts to Ex-Serviceman Only After 15 Years: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has dismissed a large batch of appeals filed by the Union...
GST

Rs. 97.26 Lakh ITC Demand Raised Through GST Refund Order Without Prior Show-Cause Process Stayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has stayed a ₹97,26,820 input tax credit (ITC) demand raised...