HomeIndirect TaxesCustoms Dept. Lacks Jurisdiction To Question Validity Of Service Exports from India:...

Customs Dept. Lacks Jurisdiction To Question Validity Of Service Exports from India: Calcutta High Court Stays S. 28AAA SCN Issued By Customs Dept. To Hinduja Global 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a relief to Hinduja Global, the Calcutta High Court has admitted a writ petition against a show cause notice under section 28AAA of the Customs Act, 1962, issued by the Customs authority and granted stay. 

The bench of Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj was of the prima facie view that Customs authority do not have the jurisdiction to question the validity of Service Exports from India Scheme (SEIS) scrips, especially, in case where the proper officers under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, have not disputed the same.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged a show-cause notice issued by the Principal Commissioner of Customs (Port) being the respondent in the application as it is devoid of jurisdiction inasmuch as SEIS scrips issued to the petitioner have not yet been cancelled by the issuing authority, viz., Cochin, EPZ and DGFT, Mumbai.

The department contended that adjudication has not yet started and all the points raised in this writ petition can be adjudicated before the adjudicating authority and prayed leave to file an affidavit-in-opposition.

As a prima facie case has been made out by the petitioner on the issue that SEIS Scrips issued by the issuing authority is still valid, the Customs authorities have no jurisdiction to issue the show-cause notice and as such the Court orders for an interim stay of the show-cause notice till the disposal of the writ petition.

“Let this matter again appear in the Monthly list of May, 2025 under the heading “Hearing”,” the court said.

Case Details

Case Title: Hinduja Global Solutions Limited & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Case No.: WPA 28896 of 2024

Date: 14.02.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Tilak Mitra

Counsel For Respondent: Kaushik Dey

Read More: Dept. Can’t Reject Fair Market Value of Shares Determined Using Statutory Methods Without Justification: Karnataka High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Procedural Bottlenecks Affecting Appeals: GSTAT Bar Association Seeks Changes In GSTAT Portal

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Bar Association, Chhattisgarh, has submitted a detailed representation to...

From Seizing/freezing to forfeiture: Unmasking Section 68J of NDPS Act

The Article "From Seizing/freezing to forfeiture: Unmasking Section 68J of NDPS Act" is written...

Karnataka High Court Quashes Dismissal of Central Tax Superintendent in Red Sanders Valuation Case

The Karnataka High Court has set aside the dismissal of K. Ananthapadmanabha, a Superintendent...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 23 May, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for May 23, 2026.GSTDGGI | Habeas Corpus Petition...

More like this

Procedural Bottlenecks Affecting Appeals: GSTAT Bar Association Seeks Changes In GSTAT Portal

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Bar Association, Chhattisgarh, has submitted a detailed representation to...

From Seizing/freezing to forfeiture: Unmasking Section 68J of NDPS Act

The Article "From Seizing/freezing to forfeiture: Unmasking Section 68J of NDPS Act" is written...

Karnataka High Court Quashes Dismissal of Central Tax Superintendent in Red Sanders Valuation Case

The Karnataka High Court has set aside the dismissal of K. Ananthapadmanabha, a Superintendent...