HomeIndirect TaxesBREAKING | Excise Policy: Supreme Court Judges Differed On CBI’s Action, But...

BREAKING | Excise Policy: Supreme Court Judges Differed On CBI’s Action, But Grants Bail To Arvind Kejriwal

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court granted bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in the excise policy case. 

The bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan presided over the matter.

Justice Suryakant stated that the Arrest by the CBI is legal. Arvind Kejriwal shall be released on a bail subject to furnishing of the bond of  Rs. 10 lakh. Kejriwal was further restrained from making comments on the case in public.

However, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan while deferring observed that the arrest was perhaps to frustrate bail to Arvind Kejriwal in ED case. 

Justice Bhuyan remarked “CBI must ensure that the perception of it being a ‘caged parrot’ is discarded. It must be above board.”

The court had reserved the verdict on September 5 after hearing counsels representing Kejriwal and CBI.

Background 

The Delhi government introduced the excise policy in 2021-22 with the objectice to revitalise the city’s flagging liquor business by replacing the sales-volume-based regime with a license fee for traders, and promised swankier stores, free of the infamous metal grilles, ultimately giving customers a better buying experience. 

However, the policy was scrapped after Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena sought a CBI probe into the policy alleging irregularities. 

Read More: Excise Policy Scam: Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail To Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal In The Money Laundering Case

As per ED, the Kejriwal-led AAP received kickbacks to the tune of  Rs. 100 crore to finalise the excise policy. It was also alleged that a large chunk of this money was used by the party in its Goa election campaign.

Case Title: Arvind Kejriwal V/S Central Bureau Of Investigation 

Case No.: Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).11023/2024

Date: 13/09/2024

Counsel For Petitioner:  Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv.

Counsel For Respondent:  Mr. Suryaprakash V. Raju, A.S.G.

Read Order

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Action Points Taxpayers Must Complete Before March 31, 2026

As the financial year 2025–26 draws to a close, businesses and tax professionals are...

New Income Tax Act, 2025: JCIT Appeal Disposal Limit Raised from Rs. 10 Lakh to Rs. 25 Lakh

The Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman stated that the proposed New Income Tax Act,...

Can Property Acquired Before PMLA Be Attached as ‘Proceeds of Crime’? Delhi High Court Examines

The Delhi High Court has delivered a significant ruling on the scope of the...

Govt. Subsidies Not Directly Attributable To Acquisition Of Specific Capital Assets, Taxable As Income: ITAT

The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that government...

More like this

Action Points Taxpayers Must Complete Before March 31, 2026

As the financial year 2025–26 draws to a close, businesses and tax professionals are...

New Income Tax Act, 2025: JCIT Appeal Disposal Limit Raised from Rs. 10 Lakh to Rs. 25 Lakh

The Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman stated that the proposed New Income Tax Act,...

Can Property Acquired Before PMLA Be Attached as ‘Proceeds of Crime’? Delhi High Court Examines

The Delhi High Court has delivered a significant ruling on the scope of the...