HomeIndirect TaxesBREAKING | Excise Policy: Supreme Court Judges Differed On CBI’s Action, But...

BREAKING | Excise Policy: Supreme Court Judges Differed On CBI’s Action, But Grants Bail To Arvind Kejriwal

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court granted bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in the excise policy case. 

The bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan presided over the matter.

Justice Suryakant stated that the Arrest by the CBI is legal. Arvind Kejriwal shall be released on a bail subject to furnishing of the bond of  Rs. 10 lakh. Kejriwal was further restrained from making comments on the case in public.

However, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan while deferring observed that the arrest was perhaps to frustrate bail to Arvind Kejriwal in ED case. 

Justice Bhuyan remarked “CBI must ensure that the perception of it being a ‘caged parrot’ is discarded. It must be above board.”

The court had reserved the verdict on September 5 after hearing counsels representing Kejriwal and CBI.

Background 

The Delhi government introduced the excise policy in 2021-22 with the objectice to revitalise the city’s flagging liquor business by replacing the sales-volume-based regime with a license fee for traders, and promised swankier stores, free of the infamous metal grilles, ultimately giving customers a better buying experience. 

However, the policy was scrapped after Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena sought a CBI probe into the policy alleging irregularities. 

Read More: Excise Policy Scam: Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail To Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal In The Money Laundering Case

As per ED, the Kejriwal-led AAP received kickbacks to the tune of  Rs. 100 crore to finalise the excise policy. It was also alleged that a large chunk of this money was used by the party in its Goa election campaign.

Case Title: Arvind Kejriwal V/S Central Bureau Of Investigation 

Case No.: Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).11023/2024

Date: 13/09/2024

Counsel For Petitioner:  Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv.

Counsel For Respondent:  Mr. Suryaprakash V. Raju, A.S.G.

Read Order

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation 

The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...