Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesSupreme Court Restores Excise Duty Demand on Textile Processor; Holds Integrated Use...

Supreme Court Restores Excise Duty Demand on Textile Processor; Holds Integrated Use of Power in Multi-Unit Process Bars Exemption

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Supreme Court Restores Excise Duty Demand on Textile Processor; Holds Integrated Use of Power in Multi-Unit Process Bars Exemption

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant ruling concerning excise duty liability and exemption claims within the textile processing industry, the Supreme Court has set aside an order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) and restored the original order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise that had confirmed excise duty, interest, and penalty against…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

Areca Nut Case | Fake ITC And False Records Attract GST Penalties Despite Dropped Tax Demand: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has restored penalties against an...
GST

GST Collected But Not Deposited: GSTAT Restores Rs. 1.19 Crore Demand And Equal Penalty Against Registered Taxpayer

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has held that Section 76...
GST

Collecting GST But Filing Nil Returns Attracts S. 76 Penalty Even For Registered Suppliers: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru State Bench, has held that...
GST

GSTR-2 Non-Operation Doesn’t Waive Interest On Supplier Payments Beyond 180 Days: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Pune Bench, has held that the...

More like this

GST

Areca Nut Case | Fake ITC And False Records Attract GST Penalties Despite Dropped Tax Demand: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has restored penalties against an...
GST

GST Collected But Not Deposited: GSTAT Restores Rs. 1.19 Crore Demand And Equal Penalty Against Registered Taxpayer

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has held that Section 76...
GST

Collecting GST But Filing Nil Returns Attracts S. 76 Penalty Even For Registered Suppliers: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru State Bench, has held that...