HomeIndirect TaxesDelhi High Court Declines to Entertain Customs Dept’s Appeal Over Rs. 57K...

Delhi High Court Declines to Entertain Customs Dept’s Appeal Over Rs. 57K Drawback Dispute, Cites Negligible Quantum

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has declined to entertain the appeal filed by the customs department over Rs. 57K drawback dispute by citing negligible quantum.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta has observed that the total amount alleged to have been wrongly availed by the customs department by way of drawback is only Rs. 57,201 and
the penalty imposed in the Order-in-Original was Rs.50,000. The assessee may have committed violations in principle, having regard to the negligible quantum involved, the Court is not inclined to entertain the present appeal.

The appeal has been filed by the department under Section 130 of the Customs Act challenging the order passed by the Central Excise, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

The proceeding arises out of Show Cause Notice that was issued to the Respondent-M/s Kunal Travels (Cargo). The allegation in the SCN was that certain goods were mis-declared and hence a penalty was imposed.

The order was appealed by the Respondent/assessee before CESTAT which has set aside the Order on the ground that there are no proper allegations in the SCN as to which of the regulations has been violated. Thus the appeal has been preferred by the Appellant-Commissioner of Customs.

The Customs Commissioner contended that the CESTAT’s order is extremely cryptic and does not deal with the matter properly on facts.

The court refused to entertain a customs appeal.

Case Details

Case Title:  Commissioner Of Customs Versus Kunal Travel Cargo

Case No.: CUSAA 74/2025 & CM APPL. 26226/2025

Date: 01/05/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Harpreet Singh

Counsel For Respondent: None

Read More: Dept. Not at Fault as Assessee Failed to Check Portal, Didn’t Respond to Show Cause Notice: Delhi High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Unauthenticated Foreign Customs Documents Can’t Establish Pakistani Origin of Imported Dry Dates: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Wrong Service Classification Alone Can’t Justify Extended Limitation Without Proof of Tax Evasion: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has held that mere classification of services under an incorrect...

No Right To Representation Against Anti-Dumping Findings: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that constitutional courts cannot routinely direct authorities to...

Coal Purchasers Can’t Be Saddled with Clean Energy Cess or Penalty Without Proof of Knowledge: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that purchasers of coal cannot be made liable...

More like this

Unauthenticated Foreign Customs Documents Can’t Establish Pakistani Origin of Imported Dry Dates: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Wrong Service Classification Alone Can’t Justify Extended Limitation Without Proof of Tax Evasion: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has held that mere classification of services under an incorrect...

No Right To Representation Against Anti-Dumping Findings: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that constitutional courts cannot routinely direct authorities to...