100% Physical Examination Found LED TVs Fully Conforming With Bill of Entry: CESTAT Quashes Undervaluation Allegations

HomeIndirect Taxes100% Physical Examination Found LED TVs Fully Conforming With Bill of Entry:...

100% Physical Examination Found LED TVs Fully Conforming With Bill of Entry: CESTAT Quashes Undervaluation Allegations

Indirect Taxes

Published on

30/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

100% Physical Examination Found LED TVs Fully Conforming With Bill of Entry: CESTAT Quashes Undervaluation Allegations

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside a substantial customs duty demand and penalties after holding that a 100% physical examination of imported LED TVs revealed complete conformity with the Bill of Entry, invoice, and packing list. The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta (Member–Judicial) and P.V. Subba Rao…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

100% Physical Examination Found LED TVs Fully Conforming With Bill of Entry: CESTAT Quashes Undervaluation Allegations

Membership Required

Latest articles

Rs. 20 Crore GST ITC Demand Quashed Based on GSTR-2A Mismatch: Karnataka High Court

Officer Delegated For Filing Appeal Before GSTAT Can’t Further Sub-Delegate: GSTAT

GSTAT to Examine Whether Delay Beyond Statutory Limit Can Be Condoned U/s 107 of CGST Act

GSTAT Transfers ITC Refund Appeals to Ghaziabad Bench; Flags Misleading Portal Display of Appellants

More like this

Rs. 20 Crore GST ITC Demand Quashed Based on GSTR-2A Mismatch: Karnataka High Court

Officer Delegated For Filing Appeal Before GSTAT Can’t Further Sub-Delegate: GSTAT

GSTAT to Examine Whether Delay Beyond Statutory Limit Can Be Condoned U/s 107 of CGST Act

About us

Company

Categories