HomeGSTThis Ruling By Kerala High Court Opens Door For Revisiting Denied GST...

This Ruling By Kerala High Court Opens Door For Revisiting Denied GST ITC Claims

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court in the case of Lloyd Insulations India Limited Versus State Tax Officer has opened the door for revisiting denied GST ITC claims.

The bench of Justice Gopinath P. has observed that on account of notification of Sub-Section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, the petitioner will be entitled to input tax credit, which has been denied to the petitioner. 

The bench directed the competent authority to revisit the case and pass fresh orders, taking into account the newly inserted Section 16(5) of the CGST Act.

The petitioner/assessee was aggrieved by the fact that petitioner has been denied the benefit of input tax credit on account of the provisions contained in Sub Section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, for the financial year 2019-20, through Ext.P3 order dated 23.08.2024.

The petitioner contended that, with the notification of Sub-Section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, the petitioner would now be entitled to the benefit of input tax credit which has been denied to the petitioner.

Sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) of section 16 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “CGST Act”) inserted in section 16 of the CGST Act, with effect from the 1st day of July, 2017, vide section 118 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, whereby the time limit to avail input tax credit under provisions of sub-section (4) of section 16 of CGST Act has been retrospectively extended in certain specified cases.

The court quashed the order to the extent that it denied input tax credit to the petitioner on account of the provisions of Sub Section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts and directing the competent authority to pass fresh orders, after taking note of the provisions contained in Section 16(5) of the CGST/SGST Acts and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of three months.

Read More: Patna High Court Upholds Notification For Extension For Issuance Of SCN U/s 73 of GST Act

Case Details

Case Title: Lloyd Insulations India Limited Versus State Tax Officer

Case No.: WP(C) NO. 40443 OF 2024

Date: 15/11/2024 

Counsel For Petitioner: Aditya Unnikrishnan,  Nivedita A.Kamath, Binisha Baby,  Saritha K.S., Anil D. Nair 

Counsel For Respondent: Jasmine M M

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Pending Regularisation Proceedings Must Be Respected: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Direction

The Supreme Court has set aside a Madras High Court order directing the Chennai...

Pre-2017 Open University Qualifications Can’t Be Used to Deny Promotion: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that an employee who obtained educational qualifications under government-recognised...

Causal Link to Yamuna Floodplain Damage Was Not Established: Supreme Court Quashes NGT’s Environmental Compensation Order

The Supreme Court has set aside the National Green Tribunal’s judgment holding the organiser...

Court Fee Issue in Property Dispute Can’t Be Decided at Threshold Without Evidence on Possession: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has set aside a Punjab and Haryana High Court order that...

More like this

Pending Regularisation Proceedings Must Be Respected: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Direction

The Supreme Court has set aside a Madras High Court order directing the Chennai...

Pre-2017 Open University Qualifications Can’t Be Used to Deny Promotion: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that an employee who obtained educational qualifications under government-recognised...

Causal Link to Yamuna Floodplain Damage Was Not Established: Supreme Court Quashes NGT’s Environmental Compensation Order

The Supreme Court has set aside the National Green Tribunal’s judgment holding the organiser...