Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTThis Ruling By Kerala High Court Opens Door For Revisiting Denied GST...

This Ruling By Kerala High Court Opens Door For Revisiting Denied GST ITC Claims

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court in the case of Lloyd Insulations India Limited Versus State Tax Officer has opened the door for revisiting denied GST ITC claims.

The bench of Justice Gopinath P. has observed that on account of notification of Sub-Section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, the petitioner will be entitled to input tax credit, which has been denied to the petitioner. 

The bench directed the competent authority to revisit the case and pass fresh orders, taking into account the newly inserted Section 16(5) of the CGST Act.

The petitioner/assessee was aggrieved by the fact that petitioner has been denied the benefit of input tax credit on account of the provisions contained in Sub Section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, for the financial year 2019-20, through Ext.P3 order dated 23.08.2024.

The petitioner contended that, with the notification of Sub-Section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, the petitioner would now be entitled to the benefit of input tax credit which has been denied to the petitioner.

Sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) of section 16 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “CGST Act”) inserted in section 16 of the CGST Act, with effect from the 1st day of July, 2017, vide section 118 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, whereby the time limit to avail input tax credit under provisions of sub-section (4) of section 16 of CGST Act has been retrospectively extended in certain specified cases.

The court quashed the order to the extent that it denied input tax credit to the petitioner on account of the provisions of Sub Section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts and directing the competent authority to pass fresh orders, after taking note of the provisions contained in Section 16(5) of the CGST/SGST Acts and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of three months.

Read More: Patna High Court Upholds Notification For Extension For Issuance Of SCN U/s 73 of GST Act

Case Details

Case Title: Lloyd Insulations India Limited Versus State Tax Officer

Case No.: WP(C) NO. 40443 OF 2024

Date: 15/11/2024 

Counsel For Petitioner: Aditya Unnikrishnan,  Nivedita A.Kamath, Binisha Baby,  Saritha K.S., Anil D. Nair 

Counsel For Respondent: Jasmine M M

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Higher Exam Marks Can’t Cure Missing Essential Qualification: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that higher marks in a recruitment examination cannot compensate...

PMLA | Failure To Expressly Address Every Written Submission Doesn’t Violate Natural Justice If Fair Hearing Is Given: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court has dismissed two writ petitions filed by JSW Steel Limited...

ED Can Continue Money Laundering Probe After Filing Complaint Without Prior Court Permission Before Charges Are Framed: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a petition challenging further investigation by the Enforcement...

No Pre-Deposit For Disputed GST Interest-Only Appeal; Customer’s Non-Payment Can’t Stop Interest Liability: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that an...

More like this

Higher Exam Marks Can’t Cure Missing Essential Qualification: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that higher marks in a recruitment examination cannot compensate...

PMLA | Failure To Expressly Address Every Written Submission Doesn’t Violate Natural Justice If Fair Hearing Is Given: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court has dismissed two writ petitions filed by JSW Steel Limited...

ED Can Continue Money Laundering Probe After Filing Complaint Without Prior Court Permission Before Charges Are Framed: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a petition challenging further investigation by the Enforcement...