Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTPlea Challenging Order Levying GST On Royalty Paid On Mining Lease: Gujarat...

Plea Challenging Order Levying GST On Royalty Paid On Mining Lease: Gujarat High Court Restrains Dept. From Taking Coercive Action 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court has restrained the GST department from taking the coercive action in a plea challenging order levying GST on royalty paid on mining lease.

The bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice D.N.Ray directed the GST Department not to take any coercive action in a challenge to the order levying GST on the royalty paid in the context of mining lease.

The petitioner has challenged the show cause notice and order issued under Section 74 of the Gujarat Goods and Sales Tax Act, 2017, for levy of GST on the royalty paid by the petitioner for quarry lease granted by the State Government.

The court issued the notice to the GST department.

It is worthwhile to note that no doubt the Supreme Court has upheld the levy of GST on royalty paid for mining rights basis, however, the issue related to the retrospective or prospective applicability of GST on mining lease/royalty is still pending before the Supreme Court.

Case Details

Case Title: Rainbow Infrastructure Versus Union Of India & Ors.

Case No.: R/Special Civil Application No. 536 Of 2025

Date: 17/01/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Krutarth K Desai

Counsel For Respondent: Ankit Shah

Read More: GST Applicability On Namkeen | Gujarat High Court Grants Interim Relief to Balaji Wafers in ₹172 Crore GST Demand Dispute

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ICAI Examines Private Equity Funding for Consultancy and Accounting Businesses, Audit Practices to Remain Ring-Fenced

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) is examining whether private equity investment...

Foreign Salary Remitted to NRE Account Can’t Be Treated as Unexplained Investment Merely on SFT Data: CIT(A) Deletes ₹1.33 Crore Addition

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi, has deleted an addition of ₹1.33 crore...

Export Commission Paid to Foreign Agents for Services Outside India Not Liable to TDS: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that commission...

DGGI | Pre-Charge Evidence Can’t Be Recorded Without Summoning Accused in GST Complaint: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside three orders passed by a...

More like this

ICAI Examines Private Equity Funding for Consultancy and Accounting Businesses, Audit Practices to Remain Ring-Fenced

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) is examining whether private equity investment...

Foreign Salary Remitted to NRE Account Can’t Be Treated as Unexplained Investment Merely on SFT Data: CIT(A) Deletes ₹1.33 Crore Addition

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi, has deleted an addition of ₹1.33 crore...

Export Commission Paid to Foreign Agents for Services Outside India Not Liable to TDS: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that commission...