Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTPlea Challenging Order Levying GST On Royalty Paid On Mining Lease: Gujarat...

Plea Challenging Order Levying GST On Royalty Paid On Mining Lease: Gujarat High Court Restrains Dept. From Taking Coercive Action 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court has restrained the GST department from taking the coercive action in a plea challenging order levying GST on royalty paid on mining lease.

The bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice D.N.Ray directed the GST Department not to take any coercive action in a challenge to the order levying GST on the royalty paid in the context of mining lease.

The petitioner has challenged the show cause notice and order issued under Section 74 of the Gujarat Goods and Sales Tax Act, 2017, for levy of GST on the royalty paid by the petitioner for quarry lease granted by the State Government.

The court issued the notice to the GST department.

It is worthwhile to note that no doubt the Supreme Court has upheld the levy of GST on royalty paid for mining rights basis, however, the issue related to the retrospective or prospective applicability of GST on mining lease/royalty is still pending before the Supreme Court.

Case Details

Case Title: Rainbow Infrastructure Versus Union Of India & Ors.

Case No.: R/Special Civil Application No. 536 Of 2025

Date: 17/01/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Krutarth K Desai

Counsel For Respondent: Ankit Shah

Read More: GST Applicability On Namkeen | Gujarat High Court Grants Interim Relief to Balaji Wafers in ₹172 Crore GST Demand Dispute

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere With GST Order Carrying RFN but No Separate DIN or Visible Signature

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling...

Negligible Listing and Disposal of GSTAT Appeals: Supreme Court Asks Tribunal President to Examine Grievance

The Supreme Court has disposed of a public interest litigation seeking court-monitored institutional reforms...

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...

Officer Who Conducted GST Audit Can’t Issue Notice and Adjudicate Same Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order after finding that the...

More like this

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere With GST Order Carrying RFN but No Separate DIN or Visible Signature

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling...

Negligible Listing and Disposal of GSTAT Appeals: Supreme Court Asks Tribunal President to Examine Grievance

The Supreme Court has disposed of a public interest litigation seeking court-monitored institutional reforms...

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...