HomeGSTPlea Challenging Order Levying GST On Royalty Paid On Mining Lease: Gujarat...

Plea Challenging Order Levying GST On Royalty Paid On Mining Lease: Gujarat High Court Restrains Dept. From Taking Coercive Action 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court has restrained the GST department from taking the coercive action in a plea challenging order levying GST on royalty paid on mining lease.

The bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice D.N.Ray directed the GST Department not to take any coercive action in a challenge to the order levying GST on the royalty paid in the context of mining lease.

The petitioner has challenged the show cause notice and order issued under Section 74 of the Gujarat Goods and Sales Tax Act, 2017, for levy of GST on the royalty paid by the petitioner for quarry lease granted by the State Government.

The court issued the notice to the GST department.

It is worthwhile to note that no doubt the Supreme Court has upheld the levy of GST on royalty paid for mining rights basis, however, the issue related to the retrospective or prospective applicability of GST on mining lease/royalty is still pending before the Supreme Court.

Case Details

Case Title: Rainbow Infrastructure Versus Union Of India & Ors.

Case No.: R/Special Civil Application No. 536 Of 2025

Date: 17/01/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Krutarth K Desai

Counsel For Respondent: Ankit Shah

Read More: GST Applicability On Namkeen | Gujarat High Court Grants Interim Relief to Balaji Wafers in ₹172 Crore GST Demand Dispute

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Dept. Can’t Levy Both Service Tax and Central Excise on Same Job Work: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Refund Can’t Be Credited to Consumer Welfare Fund Merely Because CENVAT Reversal Was Booked as Expense: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

Refund of Tax Paid Under Mistake of Law Not Time-Barred, But Builder Can’t Claim Refund After Passing Burden to Buyers: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

Transit Pass Alone Not Enough to Escape KVAT Penalty: Karnataka High Court Upholds Action Where Evidence Suggests Tax Evasion

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that the mere issuance and surrender of a...

More like this

Dept. Can’t Levy Both Service Tax and Central Excise on Same Job Work: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Refund Can’t Be Credited to Consumer Welfare Fund Merely Because CENVAT Reversal Was Booked as Expense: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

Refund of Tax Paid Under Mistake of Law Not Time-Barred, But Builder Can’t Claim Refund After Passing Burden to Buyers: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...