HomeGSTGST Applicability On Namkeen | Gujarat High Court Grants Interim Relief to...

GST Applicability On Namkeen | Gujarat High Court Grants Interim Relief to Balaji Wafers in ₹172 Crore GST Demand Dispute

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court comprising Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice D.N.Ray has granted ad interim relief to Balaji Wafers in a writ petition challenging a ₹172 crore GST demand. 

The dispute centers around the classification of ‘Namkeen’ as extruded snack pellets, which, as per CBIC circulars, attract 18% GST.

The controversy stems from the CBIC’s clarification regarding the GST applicability on extruded snack pellets in their ready-to-eat form. The tax authority classified these under HSN 1905, subjecting them to a higher 18% GST rate. However, Balaji Wafers has challenged this classification, arguing that its products fall under HSN 2106, which covers food preparations not elsewhere specified and attracts a lower GST rate.

The petitioner, Balaji Wafers has contested the legality of CBIC circulars, claiming that the circulars are ultra vires and lack legal authority. They contradict various judicial rulings, including those upheld by the Supreme Court. The insertion of Entry 32C through Notification No. 5/2024 is being misapplied in their case. The nature, nomenclature, and ingredients of their products align with HSN 2106, rather than HSN 1905, as asserted by the tax authorities.

The Gujarat High Court has allowed the adjudication proceedings to continue. However, it has imposed a restriction on passing any final order against Balaji Wafers without the court’s permission. This interim relief provides a temporary safeguard to the petitioner while the legal proceedings continue.

Case Details

Case Title: Balaji Wafers Private Limited & Anr. Versus Union Of India & Ors.

Case No.: In R/Special Civil Application No. 666 Of 2025 With R/Special Civil Application No. 666 Of 2025

Date: 29/01/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Krutarth K Desai

Counsel For Respondent: Maunil G Yajnik

Read More: Kerala GST Dept. Issues Instructions On Implementation Of E-Way Bill For Movement Of Gold And Precious Stones

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Medical Colleges Not Entitled to Five-Year Subvention After TMA Pai Verdict: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that private professional colleges cannot claim continuation of the...

Non-Signatory Shareholder Bound by Arbitration Clause: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a shareholder who did not sign a Memorandum...

Can Buyers Bypass MSME Council and Invoke Arbitration Act Directly? Supreme Court Leaves Question Open

The Supreme Court has left unresolved a significant legal question concerning the interplay between...

Statutory GST Appeal Can’t Be Circumvented by Mere Natural Justice Allegations: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has reiterated that allegations of violation of natural justice, without...

More like this

Medical Colleges Not Entitled to Five-Year Subvention After TMA Pai Verdict: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that private professional colleges cannot claim continuation of the...

Non-Signatory Shareholder Bound by Arbitration Clause: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a shareholder who did not sign a Memorandum...

Can Buyers Bypass MSME Council and Invoke Arbitration Act Directly? Supreme Court Leaves Question Open

The Supreme Court has left unresolved a significant legal question concerning the interplay between...