Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Applicability On Namkeen | Gujarat High Court Grants Interim Relief to...

GST Applicability On Namkeen | Gujarat High Court Grants Interim Relief to Balaji Wafers in ₹172 Crore GST Demand Dispute

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court comprising Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice D.N.Ray has granted ad interim relief to Balaji Wafers in a writ petition challenging a ₹172 crore GST demand. 

The dispute centers around the classification of ‘Namkeen’ as extruded snack pellets, which, as per CBIC circulars, attract 18% GST.

The controversy stems from the CBIC’s clarification regarding the GST applicability on extruded snack pellets in their ready-to-eat form. The tax authority classified these under HSN 1905, subjecting them to a higher 18% GST rate. However, Balaji Wafers has challenged this classification, arguing that its products fall under HSN 2106, which covers food preparations not elsewhere specified and attracts a lower GST rate.

The petitioner, Balaji Wafers has contested the legality of CBIC circulars, claiming that the circulars are ultra vires and lack legal authority. They contradict various judicial rulings, including those upheld by the Supreme Court. The insertion of Entry 32C through Notification No. 5/2024 is being misapplied in their case. The nature, nomenclature, and ingredients of their products align with HSN 2106, rather than HSN 1905, as asserted by the tax authorities.

The Gujarat High Court has allowed the adjudication proceedings to continue. However, it has imposed a restriction on passing any final order against Balaji Wafers without the court’s permission. This interim relief provides a temporary safeguard to the petitioner while the legal proceedings continue.

Case Details

Case Title: Balaji Wafers Private Limited & Anr. Versus Union Of India & Ors.

Case No.: In R/Special Civil Application No. 666 Of 2025 With R/Special Civil Application No. 666 Of 2025

Date: 29/01/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Krutarth K Desai

Counsel For Respondent: Maunil G Yajnik

Read More: Kerala GST Dept. Issues Instructions On Implementation Of E-Way Bill For Movement Of Gold And Precious Stones

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 15 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 15, 2026.GSTGSTAT UPHOLDS ITC REVERSAL FOR...

Investigation Deposit Can’t Be Treated as Excise Duty After Demand Is Set Aside: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has directed the tax...

FinMin Guarantees Zero Charges on RuPay Debit Card Payments and UPI Transactions Up to Rs. 2,000

The Finance Ministry has notified a no-charge rule for payments made through RuPay-powered debit...

Gold Without Foreign Markings Can’t Be Confiscated on Suspicion of Smuggling: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside the...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 15 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 15, 2026.GSTGSTAT UPHOLDS ITC REVERSAL FOR...

Investigation Deposit Can’t Be Treated as Excise Duty After Demand Is Set Aside: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has directed the tax...

FinMin Guarantees Zero Charges on RuPay Debit Card Payments and UPI Transactions Up to Rs. 2,000

The Finance Ministry has notified a no-charge rule for payments made through RuPay-powered debit...