HomeGSTNo GST Exemption For Transportation and Catering Services Billed Directly to Students:...

No GST Exemption For Transportation and Catering Services Billed Directly to Students: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR) has clarified that transportation and catering services for school students do not qualify for GST exemption under Serial No. 66(b)(i) and (ii) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) when fees are collected directly from parents instead of the educational institution.

The ruling arose from a case involving services provided exclusively to students and staff of a Surat-based higher secondary school. While the school’s managing trust had entered into agreements for both transportation and catering, the charges for student services were billed directly to parents, whereas staff services were invoiced to the school or trust.

GAAR held that for the exemption to apply, services must be rendered to the educational institution itself, with the institution making payment. Direct billing to students or parents breaks this requirement, making the services taxable.

The authority also refused to entertain a related query on refund eligibility for taxes paid in earlier years, noting that refund issues do not fall within the scope of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.

In addition, a request to alter the applicant’s legal name in the ruling due to a recent change in business structure was rejected, as the application had been filed under the original entity name.

The AAR held that GST exemption applies only if the educational institution itself is the recipient and payer for services. Direct billing to students disqualifies services from exemption. Contractual and payment arrangements are critical in determining tax treatment.

Ruling Details

Applicant’s Name: M/s Protego Services LLP

Ruling Date: 26/06/2025

Read More: GST ITC on Telecom Towers Upheld: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Compensation for Delayed Possession Of Flats To Homebuyers Can’t Be Limited by One-Sided Builder Clauses: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of consumer forums to award fair compensation...

Extended Limitation Not Invocable Without Suppression: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on Online Advertisement

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS Unsustainable When Underlying Services Are Exempt: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

SEBI Suspends General Manager in Vigilance Case Linked to SME IPO Probe

In a significant internal development, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has...

More like this

Compensation for Delayed Possession Of Flats To Homebuyers Can’t Be Limited by One-Sided Builder Clauses: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of consumer forums to award fair compensation...

Extended Limitation Not Invocable Without Suppression: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on Online Advertisement

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS Unsustainable When Underlying Services Are Exempt: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...