Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTIGST Demand On Non-Cross Charged Expenses Quashed: Delhi High Court

IGST Demand On Non-Cross Charged Expenses Quashed: Delhi High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has quashed the Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) demand on non-cross charged expenses.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta has overturned a tax demand on expenses not cross-charged by the petitioner to its other entities. Following Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST and its own ruling that canceled a secondment demand, the Court clarified that un-invoiced services can be valued at ‘zero’ when full tax credit is available.

The Petitioner, M/s Kei Industries Limited has challenged the Order passed by the Adjudicating Authority i.e. Additional Commissioner, Central GST, Delhi East.

The short question that arises in the present petition is whether any payment of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) was required in respect of those expenses which were incurred by the Petitioner but were not cross-charged with the other entities.

The court noted that the Order clearly shows that there were no cross-charges of expenses with the other entities. Moreover, the second proviso to Rule 28 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 has been applied without giving benefit of the Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST and consideration to the circular.

The court directed the Adjudicating Authority to afford a hearing once again to the Petitioner and pass a fresh order in the light of the Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST dated 17th July, 2023.

Case Details

Case Title: M/S KEI INDUSTRIES LIMITED Versus UOI

Case No.: W.P.(C) 6919/2025 & CM APPL. 31310/2025

Date:  22.05.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: V. Lakshmikumaran

Counsel For Respondent: Kshitij Chhabra, Senior Panel Counsel

Read More: President Approves Empanelment & Promotion of Sahil Inamdar to Commissioner of Customs & Indirect Taxes

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 23 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 23, 2026.GSTREVISED GST RETURN FORMS TO...

Tax Dept. Can’t Disown System-Generated Hearing Notice: Punjab and Haryana High Court 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside a tax adjudication order passed...

2 Adjoining Flats Can Qualify For Capital Gain Exemption: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that exemption...

Delay Due To Missed Tax Emails Condoned: ITAT Imposes Rs. 5,000 Cost On Taxpayer

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has condoned delays of...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 23 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 23, 2026.GSTREVISED GST RETURN FORMS TO...

Tax Dept. Can’t Disown System-Generated Hearing Notice: Punjab and Haryana High Court 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside a tax adjudication order passed...

2 Adjoining Flats Can Qualify For Capital Gain Exemption: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that exemption...