Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTRs. 23.47 Crore GST Fraud: Meerut Court Remands Accused to Judicial Custody

Rs. 23.47 Crore GST Fraud: Meerut Court Remands Accused to Judicial Custody

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Meerut Court has remanded the person accused of Rs. 23.47 Crore GST Fraud to the judicial custody.

Azharuddin, proprietor of M/s New Global Scrap Traders, was arrested by the CGST Commissionerate, Gautam Buddh Nagar, for his alleged role in availing and passing on fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the tune of ₹23.47 crore based on bogus invoices issued without actual supply of goods.

The ITC was passed through a nexus of non-existent entities, and ultimately credited to M/s Ambashakti Industries Ltd. The search operations at the declared business premises of several supplier firms revealed them to be non-operational, strengthening the case of a fictitious supply chain and circular trading in violation of Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Following the arrest, the accused was produced before the Remand Magistrate / Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut. During the proceedings, the defence objected to the arrest procedure, alleging non-compliance with mandatory safeguards under the CGST Act and BNSS, including claims of illegal detention exceeding 24 hours.

However, after hearing both sides and perusing the departmental documents, the Hon’ble Court rejected the defence objections, noting absence of any prima facie material to support the claims.

On behalf of the prosecution, Mr. Lakshay Kumar Singh, Special Public Prosecutor (GST), appeared and successfully argued for judicial custody, citing the seriousness of the offence, risk of tampering with evidence, and the statutory non-bailable nature of the offence under Section 132(5) CGST Act. Accepting the submission, the Court granted 14 days’ judicial remand of the accused till 27 June 2025, directing his lodging at District Jail, Meerut.

Read more: CGST & C.Ex Raigad Commissionerate Hosts GST Conclave

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DRC-01 Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: GSTAT  

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Division Bench, has delivered a...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 14 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 14, 2026.GSTGST DEPT. CANT ADJUST SANCTIONED...

No GST On Recovery Of Electricity Charges At Actual Cost Without Markup: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has held that electricity charges recovered...

18% GST On New Water Pipeline Construction: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has ruled that works involving the...

More like this

DRC-01 Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: GSTAT  

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Division Bench, has delivered a...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 14 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 14, 2026.GSTGST DEPT. CANT ADJUST SANCTIONED...

No GST On Recovery Of Electricity Charges At Actual Cost Without Markup: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has held that electricity charges recovered...