Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTRs. 108 Crore GST Evasion: Madras High Court Grants Bail Subject To...

Rs. 108 Crore GST Evasion: Madras High Court Grants Bail Subject To Rs. 5 Lakh Bond

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has granted the bail to the accused in GST Evasion of Rs. 108 Crore in Chennai subject to the furnishing of the bond of Rs. 5 Lakhs.

The bench of Justice Sunder Mohan has observed that onerous conditions cannot be imposed while granting bail. Hence, the court is inclined to grant interim stay of the condition imposed in para 10(a) of the trial court order. Insofar as, condition No.10(c), it is modified, directing the petitioner to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.5,00,000 with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore.

The petitioners submitted that, though the petitioners were released on bail, onerous conditions were imposed, directing them to pay a sum of Rs.1,08,19,43,799/- to the credit of GST within a period of four weeks and to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.1 crore with two sureties. 

The petitioner pointed out that the Trial Court had imposed such a condition after holding that the arrest was illegal.

The court listed the cases on 02.04.2025 for filing counter by the respondent/department.

Case Details

Case Title: Pulkit Garg Versus The Senior Intelligence Officer

Case No.: CRL OP NO. 7983 of 2025 AND CRL OP NO. 7984 OF 2025

Date: 20-03-2025

Counsel For Petitioner: B.Kumar, Senior Counsel 

Counsel For Respondent: P.Santhosh, Special Government Pleader

Read More: Govt. Announces Rs.1,500 Crore Incentive Scheme to Boost Low-Value BHIM-UPI Transactions

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DRC-01 Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: GSTAT  

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Division Bench, has delivered a...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 14 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 14, 2026.GSTGST DEPT. CANT ADJUST SANCTIONED...

No GST On Recovery Of Electricity Charges At Actual Cost Without Markup: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has held that electricity charges recovered...

18% GST On New Water Pipeline Construction: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has ruled that works involving the...

More like this

DRC-01 Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: GSTAT  

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Division Bench, has delivered a...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 14 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 14, 2026.GSTGST DEPT. CANT ADJUST SANCTIONED...

No GST On Recovery Of Electricity Charges At Actual Cost Without Markup: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has held that electricity charges recovered...