Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTRs. 108 Crore GST Evasion: Madras High Court Grants Bail Subject To...

Rs. 108 Crore GST Evasion: Madras High Court Grants Bail Subject To Rs. 5 Lakh Bond

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has granted the bail to the accused in GST Evasion of Rs. 108 Crore in Chennai subject to the furnishing of the bond of Rs. 5 Lakhs.

The bench of Justice Sunder Mohan has observed that onerous conditions cannot be imposed while granting bail. Hence, the court is inclined to grant interim stay of the condition imposed in para 10(a) of the trial court order. Insofar as, condition No.10(c), it is modified, directing the petitioner to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.5,00,000 with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore.

The petitioners submitted that, though the petitioners were released on bail, onerous conditions were imposed, directing them to pay a sum of Rs.1,08,19,43,799/- to the credit of GST within a period of four weeks and to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.1 crore with two sureties. 

The petitioner pointed out that the Trial Court had imposed such a condition after holding that the arrest was illegal.

The court listed the cases on 02.04.2025 for filing counter by the respondent/department.

Case Details

Case Title: Pulkit Garg Versus The Senior Intelligence Officer

Case No.: CRL OP NO. 7983 of 2025 AND CRL OP NO. 7984 OF 2025

Date: 20-03-2025

Counsel For Petitioner: B.Kumar, Senior Counsel 

Counsel For Respondent: P.Santhosh, Special Government Pleader

Read More: Govt. Announces Rs.1,500 Crore Incentive Scheme to Boost Low-Value BHIM-UPI Transactions

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Customs Bank Account Freeze Can’t Continue Beyond 12 Months Merely Because Adjudication Is Pending: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has held that the provisional attachment of a bank account...

57th GST Council Meeting Rescheduled To October 8 Due To Unavoidable Circumstances

The 57th meeting of the Goods and Services Tax Council has been rescheduled to...

Additional Excise Duty Credit Can’t Offset Basic Excise Duty Under Old MODVAT Rules: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has held that additional excise duty paid on inputs during...

Reassessment Scrutiny Can’t Begin Before Taxpayer’s Objections Are Decided: Bombay HC Quashes Premature Notices

The Bombay High Court has held that an Assessing Officer cannot issue scrutiny notices...

More like this

Customs Bank Account Freeze Can’t Continue Beyond 12 Months Merely Because Adjudication Is Pending: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has held that the provisional attachment of a bank account...

57th GST Council Meeting Rescheduled To October 8 Due To Unavoidable Circumstances

The 57th meeting of the Goods and Services Tax Council has been rescheduled to...

Additional Excise Duty Credit Can’t Offset Basic Excise Duty Under Old MODVAT Rules: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has held that additional excise duty paid on inputs during...