Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTRs. 27 Crore GST Demand Against Dell Stayed Over Alleged Jurisdictional Error:...

Rs. 27 Crore GST Demand Against Dell Stayed Over Alleged Jurisdictional Error: Allahabad High Court  

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court stayed the operation of a GST demand order issued against Dell International Services India Private Limited, observing that the company had raised serious concerns regarding jurisdictional error and violation of principles of natural justice.

Taking note of the submission that “against proposed demand Rs. 9 crores the demand of tax Rs. 13 crores has been confirmed,” the Division Bench comprising Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Indrajeet Shukla granted four weeks’ time to the State authorities to file a counter affidavit, with two weeks thereafter for the petitioner to file a rejoinder.

Dell International Services India Pvt. Ltd., the Indian services arm of US technology giant Dell, challenged the adjudication order on the ground that the final demand substantially exceeded the amount proposed in the original show cause notice (SCN).

According to the petition, the SCN had proposed a tax demand of ₹9,49,18,645, along with interest of ₹7,26,12,746 and penalty of ₹9,49,18,645. However, the impugned order dated January 19, 2026, confirmed a significantly higher liability — tax of ₹13,18,30,760, interest of ₹12,58,64,064 and penalty of ₹1,31,83,076 — taking the cumulative demand to ₹27,08,77,899.69.

Counsel appearing for the company argued that while the proposed tax demand was approximately ₹9 crore, the final order confirmed tax exceeding ₹13 crore without putting the petitioner on notice regarding the enhanced liability. It was contended that the adjudicating authority had travelled beyond the scope of the show cause notice, rendering the order legally unsustainable.

The petitioner further submitted that the proceedings suffered from a violation of natural justice and that a jurisdictional error had crept into the adjudication process.

Pending further hearing, the Court directed that the operation and effect of the impugned order dated January 19, 2026, passed by the concerned authority shall remain stayed until the next date of listing.

The matter will now be taken up after completion of pleadings.

Case Details

Case Title: M/S Dell International Services India Private Limited Versus State of U.P. and Another

Case No.: WRIT TAX No. – 801 of 2026

Date: 02/02/2026

Counsel For  Petitioner: Nishant Mishra, Vedika Nath

Counsel For Respondent: C.S.C.

Read More: GST Payable Over and Above Tender Amount: Kerala High Court Quashes Recovery From Contractor

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CENVAT Credit Eligibility Bars Extended Limitation, But Doesn’t Wipe Out Reverse Charge Service Tax Liability: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Offshore Services Claim Needs Evidence; Service Tax Paid by ONGC Must Be Verified: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has directed fresh...

Share Valuation Can’t Be Rejected Without Expert Opinion Merely Because Projections Differ From Actual Results: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted a share premium addition under...

ED Arrests Advocate Over Alleged Bribes to Unfreeze Accounts in Rs. 28,000 Crore Cyber Fraud Network Probe

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has arrested an advocate for allegedly helping a nationwide cyber...

More like this

CENVAT Credit Eligibility Bars Extended Limitation, But Doesn’t Wipe Out Reverse Charge Service Tax Liability: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Offshore Services Claim Needs Evidence; Service Tax Paid by ONGC Must Be Verified: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has directed fresh...

Share Valuation Can’t Be Rejected Without Expert Opinion Merely Because Projections Differ From Actual Results: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted a share premium addition under...