Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Charges Dropped Against Ather Energy; Shares Rise Modestly Post-Clarity

GST Charges Dropped Against Ather Energy; Shares Rise Modestly Post-Clarity

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Electric two-wheeler manufacturer Ather Energy Ltd. has received relief from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities as the department has officially dropped all charges related to alleged discrepancies in inverted duty structure refunds. 

The development has also led to a modest rise in the company’s share price.

The company was earlier served Show Cause Notices dated January 3, 2025, wherein the GST Department had raised demands amounting to INR 47.30 million for August 2021, INR 60.60 million for April 2022, and INR 121.40 million for April 2023. These demands pertained to refunds claimed under the inverted duty structure, which allows businesses to claim a refund when the tax rate on inputs is higher than that on outputs.

The details of this tax matter had also been disclosed by Ather in its Prospectus dated April 30, 2025, under the “Material Litigation” section, ahead of its public listing plans.

However, on June 14, 2025, Ather Energy informed both the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) and BSE Limited that, upon reviewing the company’s explanation, the GST Department has decided to drop all three charges.

Ather Energy will not be required to pay the earlier demanded amounts totaling over INR 229 million. There will be no adverse financial impact on the company’s operations. The matter is now considered officially closed.

Read More: ICETAB Launched to Boost Export Efficiency and Transparency at CBIC Conference in New Delhi

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Customs Refund Limitation Runs From Date of Communication of Final Assessment Order, Not Date of Passing: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CESTAT Allows Customs Duty Exemption on Reliance Industries’ Imported MEG Reclamation Plant for Petroleum Operations

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Factory Setup Services Qualify for CENVAT Credit Despite Deletion of ‘Setting Up’ From Definition: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that services...

Absence Of E-Way Bill Can’t Establish Gold Smuggling Without Proof Of Foreign Origin: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that discrepancies...

More like this

Customs Refund Limitation Runs From Date of Communication of Final Assessment Order, Not Date of Passing: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CESTAT Allows Customs Duty Exemption on Reliance Industries’ Imported MEG Reclamation Plant for Petroleum Operations

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Factory Setup Services Qualify for CENVAT Credit Despite Deletion of ‘Setting Up’ From Definition: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that services...