GST SCN U/s 74 Stayed Citing Absence of Suppression Despite Statutory Disclosure: Gujarat HC

HomeGSTGST SCN U/s 74 Stayed Citing Absence of Suppression Despite Statutory Disclosure:...

GST SCN U/s 74 Stayed Citing Absence of Suppression Despite Statutory Disclosure: Gujarat HC

GST Top Stories

Published on

02/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

GST SCN U/s 74 Stayed Citing Absence of Suppression Despite Statutory Disclosure: Gujarat HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection against coercive GST proceedings, observing that the impugned Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued under Section 74(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 appears to be prima facie without jurisdiction due to the absence of any material evidence of suppression of facts. The relief was…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Statutory Disclosure

GST SCN U/s 74 Stayed Citing Absence of Suppression Despite Statutory Disclosure: Gujarat HC

Membership Required

Latest articles

Classification of ‘Lip Seal’ as Rubber Product, Not Automobile Part; Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked in Interpretation Disputes: CESTAT

Imported Marble Diversion Into Domestic Market Not Supported By Evidence: CESTAT Quashes 10.80 Crore Customs Duty Demand On EOU

Karnataka High Court Upholds GST Cross-Empowerment: State Tax Officers Can Act as ‘Proper Officers’ Under IGST Without Separate Notification

Luxury Pens Worth Rs. 30 Lakh Seized at Ahmedabad Airport

More like this

Classification of ‘Lip Seal’ as Rubber Product, Not Automobile Part; Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked in Interpretation Disputes: CESTAT

Imported Marble Diversion Into Domestic Market Not Supported By Evidence: CESTAT Quashes 10.80 Crore Customs Duty Demand On EOU

Karnataka High Court Upholds GST Cross-Empowerment: State Tax Officers Can Act as ‘Proper Officers’ Under IGST Without Separate Notification

About us

Company

Categories