Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesClassification of ‘Lip Seal’ as Rubber Product, Not Automobile Part; Extended Limitation...

Classification of ‘Lip Seal’ as Rubber Product, Not Automobile Part; Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked in Interpretation Disputes: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Classification of ‘Lip Seal’ as Rubber Product, Not Automobile Part; Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked in Interpretation Disputes: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that “lip seals” are classifiable as rubber products and not as automobile parts, while also setting aside the invocation of the extended period of limitation in the absence of intent to evade duty.  The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 5 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 5, 2026.GSTRS. 50K COST IMPOSED ON...
Indirect Taxes

Documentary Evidence Dominates Probe, Further Custody Unwarranted: Mumbai Court Grants Bail in Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a 24-year-old businessman arrested by the Directorate...
Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...

More like this

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 5 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 5, 2026.GSTRS. 50K COST IMPOSED ON...
Indirect Taxes

Documentary Evidence Dominates Probe, Further Custody Unwarranted: Mumbai Court Grants Bail in Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a 24-year-old businessman arrested by the Directorate...
Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...