Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesImported Marble Diversion Into Domestic Market Not Supported By Evidence: CESTAT Quashes...

Imported Marble Diversion Into Domestic Market Not Supported By Evidence: CESTAT Quashes 10.80 Crore Customs Duty Demand On EOU

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Imported Marble Diversion Into Domestic Market Not Supported By Evidence: CESTAT Quashes 10.80 Crore Customs Duty Demand On EOU

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has set aside a customs duty demand of over ₹10.80 crore raised against M/s United Natural Stone, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), holding that the allegations of diversion of imported marble into the domestic market were not supported by credible evidence.  The bench…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...
Notification

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...
GST

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...
Columns

Why do GST Dept. Recover ITC From Buyers When Suppliers Fail to Deposit Tax?

A purchaser may hold a valid tax invoice, receive the goods or services, pay...

More like this

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...
Notification

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...
GST

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...