Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTFood Supply To Patients By Service Provider In Hospital Is Not A...

Food Supply To Patients By Service Provider In Hospital Is Not A Composite Supply Included In Health Care Services: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The West Bengal Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that supply made by the service provider to the Central Hospital is a standalone service of supply of food and in no way can be considered as a composite supply of health care services.

The bench of Dr Tanisha Dutta and Joyjit Banik has observed that the Central Hospital, being a clinical establishment, provides food to the in-patients. Such food has been outsourced by the Hospital from the applicant. Therefore, food supplied to the in-patients as advised by the doctor/nutritionists constitutes a part of the composite supply of health care services in the hand of the Central Hospital itself. Supply made by the applicant to the Central Hospital is a standalone service of supply of food and in no way can be considered as a composite supply of health care services.

The applicant is a service provider and engaged in providing catering services to the hospital canteen. 

The applicant sought the advance ruling on the issue whether the supply of food to all the inpatients would be considered as exempted supply under Notification No. 12/2017 read with Section 8(a) of the GST Act.

Yet another issue raised was whether the applicant is correctly raising invoices by considering the services provided to the Central Hospital, South Eastern Railway, Garden Reach Road, Kolkata 700043 falling under the SAC 999311 which is exempted as per entry Notification 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

The applicant argues that services of providing diet to inpatients of the hospital is exempted vide serial no 74 of the Notification No 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

The AAR noted that the hospital provides such food to the in-patients in an outsourced manner i.e., food is supplied by a separate person according to the contract made by the hospital. Therefore, the scope of the applicant is limited in preparing food and supplies the same to the in-patients only.

The AAR held that supply of food by the applicant to all in-patients would not be covered under entry No 74 of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 to be an exempted supply.

The AAR ruled that tax is payable by the applicant on his supply made to Central Hospital, South Eastern Railway.

Applicant’s Name: BAMAPADA JANA

Date: 01/10/2024

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...

Can Foreign Assets Be Assessed for AY 2018–19 When the First Black Money Act Notice Was Issued in FY 2018–19? Karnataka High Court Says...

The Karnataka High Court has quashed an assessment concerning two properties in Morocco after...

More like this

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...