Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Dept. to Share Relied Upon Documents In Rs. 172 Crore ITC...

GST Dept. to Share Relied Upon Documents In Rs. 172 Crore ITC Fraud Case Involving Goods-less Invoices: Delhi HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has directed the Goods and Service Tax Department (GST) to provide relied upon documents (RUDs)  in Rs. 172 Crore Input Tax Credit (ITC) fraud case involving goods-less invoices.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta has directed that the Department shall make available to the Petitioner all the Relied Upon documents (RUDs) within two weeks on the email address.

The Petitioner/assessee, SS Enterprises assailed the Order passed by the Additional Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST Delhi West Commissionerate. The order imposed a penalty to the tune of Rs. 36,05,299 upon the Petitioner.

A perusal of the order would show that the Petitioner is alleged to have received the goods-less invoices from two firms, namely M/s. Shivaay Trading and Satyam Associates, which are firms stated to be belonging to Ms. Aaarti Kapoor. The total availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) is alleged to be to the tune of Rs. 172 Crores through fake and fraudulent firms and goods-less invoices.

The Petitioner submitted that the hearing notice was not received by the Petitioner. three personal hearings have not been given to the Petitioner. In fact, a perusal of Section 75(5) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) would show that the provision merely contemplates that the maximum adjournments shall be given for three times but does not in effect mean that three hearings have to be given.

The department contended that the personal hearing notice having been received by the Petitioner and the Petitioner having not availed of the hearing, cannot now be permitted to raise a grievance in respect thereof, against the Department.

The department contended that the order is an appealable order. Accordingly, let the Petitioner file an appeal in respect of impugned order under Section 107 of the CGST Act to the Appellate Authority. 

The court directed the petitioner to file an appeal and permitted them to file any documents that they wished to place on record.

Case Details

Case Title: SS Enterprises Versus Office Of The Commissioner Central Tax Delhi West 

Case No.: W.P.(C) 5684/2025

Date: 01/05/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Shivani Sethi

Counsel For Respondent: Aakarsh Srivastava, Senior Standing Counsel 

Read More: Delhi High Court Declines to Entertain Customs Dept’s Appeal Over Rs. 57K Drawback Dispute, Cites Negligible Quantum

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...