Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTRs. 8.99 Crores GST Refund Allowed; Dept. Failed To Challenge Order: Delhi...

Rs. 8.99 Crores GST Refund Allowed; Dept. Failed To Challenge Order: Delhi High Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Court while allowing the Goods and Service Tax (GST) refund of Rs. 8.99 Crores held that so long as there is no challenge and no stay by the department, the refund could not have been held up. 

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta has observed that the Department is refusing to follow the decision of this Court by observing that it does not accept the decision in Metal One Corporation. Even if the Department wishes to challenge the judgment in Metal One Corporation or the judgement in the Petitioners’ case, so long as there is no challenge and no stay, the refund could not have been held up.

The Petitioner, Thales India Private Limited challenged the Order passed by the Respondent-Assistant Commissioner of CGST, Delhi. The Petitioner has sought the refund of the sum of Rs. 8,99,61,147 in terms of the order passed in ‘Thales India Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner of CGST, Audit-II, Delhi & Anr.’ 

The Coordinate Bench has followed the earlier judgment in W.P.(C) 14945/2023 titled ‘Metal One Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India’, which dealt with an identical controversy and had quashed the Show Cause Notice therein dated 31st May, 2024.

The Petitioners then filed the refund application, which has been rejected by the the Assistant Commissioner, Mr. Ram Gopal Sagar. It was observed that the services provided in respect of seconded employees fall under the definition of supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 and subsequently under the definition of ‘import of service’ under Section 5(3) of the IGST Act, 20 17. The  party is not eligible for refund of Rs.8 ,99,61,147.

The court while disposing of the writ petition directed the department to process the refund and the refund to be credited within two months.

Case Details

Case Title: Thales India Private Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner Of CGST, Delhi

Case No.:  W.P.(C) 5563/2025

Date:   27.05.2025

Counsel For Petitioner:  Sunil Dalal, Sr. Adv

Counsel For Respondent: Samiksha Godiyal, SSC, CBIC

Read More: CBIC Extends Deadline For Sensitive Cargo Declarations Till 30 Sept. 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Waiver Application Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Missing DRC-03A If Tax Was Already Paid: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside an order rejecting a taxpayer’s application for...

GST Notice Issued After Regular Assessment Deadline Stayed as Court Questions Basis for Invoking S. 74: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has granted an interim stay in appeal against a GST...

Supplier’s Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Alone Can’t Undo Rs. 76,750 ITC Relief: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Lucknow Bench has dismissed a departmental...

Govt. to Evaluate RoSCTL and RoDTEP Export Schemes Amid Changing Global Trade Conditions

NITI Aayog’s proposed study will examine whether the two tax remission schemes are helping...

More like this

GST Waiver Application Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Missing DRC-03A If Tax Was Already Paid: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside an order rejecting a taxpayer’s application for...

GST Notice Issued After Regular Assessment Deadline Stayed as Court Questions Basis for Invoking S. 74: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has granted an interim stay in appeal against a GST...

Supplier’s Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Alone Can’t Undo Rs. 76,750 ITC Relief: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Lucknow Bench has dismissed a departmental...