Rs. 8.99 Crores GST Refund Allowed; Dept. Failed To Challenge Order: Delhi High Court

The Delhi Court while allowing the Goods and Service Tax (GST) refund of Rs. 8.99 Crores held that so long as there is no challenge and no stay by the department, the refund could not have been held up. 

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta has observed that the Department is refusing to follow the decision of this Court by observing that it does not accept the decision in Metal One Corporation. Even if the Department wishes to challenge the judgment in Metal One Corporation or the judgement in the Petitioners’ case, so long as there is no challenge and no stay, the refund could not have been held up.

The Petitioner, Thales India Private Limited challenged the Order passed by the Respondent-Assistant Commissioner of CGST, Delhi. The Petitioner has sought the refund of the sum of Rs. 8,99,61,147 in terms of the order passed in ‘Thales India Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner of CGST, Audit-II, Delhi & Anr.’ 

The Coordinate Bench has followed the earlier judgment in W.P.(C) 14945/2023 titled ‘Metal One Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India’, which dealt with an identical controversy and had quashed the Show Cause Notice therein dated 31st May, 2024.

The Petitioners then filed the refund application, which has been rejected by the the Assistant Commissioner, Mr. Ram Gopal Sagar. It was observed that the services provided in respect of seconded employees fall under the definition of supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 and subsequently under the definition of ‘import of service’ under Section 5(3) of the IGST Act, 20 17. The  party is not eligible for refund of Rs.8 ,99,61,147.

The court while disposing of the writ petition directed the department to process the refund and the refund to be credited within two months.

Case Details

Case Title: Thales India Private Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner Of CGST, Delhi

Case No.:  W.P.(C) 5563/2025

Date:   27.05.2025

Counsel For Petitioner:  Sunil Dalal, Sr. Adv

Counsel For Respondent: Samiksha Godiyal, SSC, CBIC

Read More: CBIC Extends Deadline For Sensitive Cargo Declarations Till 30 Sept. 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Is Indian Property Law in Crisis? Dr. Ajay Kummar Pandey’s New Book Sparks National Dialogue

Aakiriti Shantiniketan played host to a landmark event in India’s legal landscape…

Govt. Regularizes GST On Co-Insurance Premium Apportioned By Lead Insurer To The Co-Insurer 

The Ministry of Finance has issued the circular regarding the regularizing payment…

India Imposes Anti-Dumping Duty on Imports of These Key Industrial Chemicals from China and USA

The Ministry of Finance has officially imposed anti-dumping duties on the import…

Writ petition Challenging GST SCN Is Not Maintainable Unless Demonstrates Violation Of Jurisdiction, Fundamental Rights, Or Natural Justice: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that the writ petition challenging SCN…