Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTClubbing Multiple FY U/s 74 Impermissible Without Fraud Allegation: Bombay HC Quashes...

Clubbing Multiple FY U/s 74 Impermissible Without Fraud Allegation: Bombay HC Quashes Consolidated GST Notices

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Clubbing Multiple FY U/s 74 Impermissible Without Fraud Allegation: Bombay HC Quashes Consolidated GST Notices

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court has quashed multiple show cause-cum-demand notices issued by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) on the ground that they impermissibly clubbed several financial years into a single notice. The Bench of Justices Arun R. Pedneker and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav has observed that the statutory scheme under the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...
Supreme Court

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...
Supreme Court

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies S. 28A Land Acquisition Limitation

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition...

More like this

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...
Supreme Court

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...
Supreme Court

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...