Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxITAT Dismisses Department’s Appeal Against NFAC’s Order Citing Low Tax Effect

ITAT Dismisses Department’s Appeal Against NFAC’s Order Citing Low Tax Effect

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed the income tax department’s appeal citing low tax effect.

The bench of Madhumita Roy (Judicial Member) has observed that the tax effect by the department is less than Rs.60,00,000, and thus the appeal preferred by the Revenue is found to be not maintainable.

The appeal was preferred by the department against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), New Delhi, for the Assessment Year 2011-12.

At the outset, the the assessee submitted that the CBDT has issued a Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024, by which the monetary limits for filing of appeal by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLP before Supreme Court have been increased as a measure for reducing Litigation. 

The revised monetary limits for filing the appeals before Appellate Tribunal, High Court and Supreme Court is Rs. 60,00,000/-, Rs. 2,00,00,000/- and Rs. 5,00,00,000/- respectively.

The tribunal observed that if the department finds at a later point of time that the tax effect in the appeal is more than Rs.60 lakhs or despite low tax effect, the appeal of the revenue is maintainable, the revenue is at liberty to move this Tribunal for recalling of the order.

Read More: CBIC Issues Clarification On Availability Of ITC On Goods Delivered By Supplier At Place Of Business Under Ex-Works Contract

Case Details

Case Title: DCIT Versus Praduyman Kumar Sharma

Case No.: ITA No. 2176/DEL/2024

Date: 01.01.2025

Counsel For Appellant: CA P S Kashyap

Counsel For Respondent: Sanjay Kumar

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Ocean Freight IGST Refund Can’t Be Denied for Payments Before Mohit Minerals Ruling: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Surat Bench, has held that refund...

ITC On Resort Construction Blocked Despite Taxable Business Use; ₹9.32 Lakh Demand Upheld: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has dismissed a resort’s...

ITC Reversal Dispute Involves Question Of Law, Can’t Be Decided Merely By Checking GST Returns: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that a...

Rs. 1.53 Crore GST Refund Dispute Over Place Of Supply Must Be Heard By Principal Bench: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi State Bench, has transferred a...

More like this

Ocean Freight IGST Refund Can’t Be Denied for Payments Before Mohit Minerals Ruling: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Surat Bench, has held that refund...

ITC On Resort Construction Blocked Despite Taxable Business Use; ₹9.32 Lakh Demand Upheld: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has dismissed a resort’s...

ITC Reversal Dispute Involves Question Of Law, Can’t Be Decided Merely By Checking GST Returns: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that a...