Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxIncome Tax Notices Issued to Deceased Person Not Binding on Legal Representatives:...

Income Tax Notices Issued to Deceased Person Not Binding on Legal Representatives: Bombay High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has held that income tax notices issued to deceased persons are not binding on legal representatives.

The bench of Justice M.S. Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain has observed that the notices to a dead person or orders against a dead person are null and void.

The appellant/legal heir of the assessee has submitted that reassessment notices and order were issued in the name of Late Ahmed Gulamnabi Shaikh, who had expired on 13 August 2016. The fact of his demise was intimated to the Income-tax Officer. Despite the notice, the notices and orders were issued in the name of the dead person. The notices and orders are null and void. 

The department contended that the assessees had furnished the email IDs of their chartered accountant. As such, all notices were being addressed to the chartered accountant. No intimation was given by the chartered accountant about the demise. He submitted that in terms of section 159 of the Income-tax Act, proceedings can be carried out or continued against the legal representatives. The petitioner claimed to be the legal representative. Therefore, there was no question of any nullities involved, and no reliefs could be granted to the petitioner.

The court held that no notices were issued to the legal representatives. The notices were issued to the dead person, and consequently, the legal representatives cannot be said to know about such notices. The notices or the order made based thereon and same binds the legal representatives.

Case Details

Case Title: Amjad Ahmed Shaikh Versus ITO

Case No.: Writ Petition No. 744 Of 2025

Date: 4 March 2025

Counsel For Appellant: Priyanka Jain 

Counsel For Respondent: Mamta Omle

Read More: Retracted Statement Alone Not Sufficient for Income Tax Addition, No Incriminating Material Found: Gauhati High Court

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Negative Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger Permissible for GST Recovery U/s 79: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the GST authorities may resort to negative...

GST ITC Rejection on Property Constructed for Leasing Can’t Ignore Supreme Court’s Safari Retreats Ruling: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside assessment orders rejecting input tax credit (ITC)...

CBIC Reviews JNCH Preparedness for 100% Non-Intrusive Inspection of Import Containers

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has reviewed the preparedness of...

WHEN WELFARE TAKES A BACK SEAT: INTERIM CHILD CUSTODY, COMITY AND STEREOTYPICAL NOTIONS OF MATRIMONY

The Article “WHEN WELFARE TAKES A BACK SEAT: INTERIM CHILD CUSTODY, COMITY AND STEREOTYPICAL...

More like this

Negative Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger Permissible for GST Recovery U/s 79: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the GST authorities may resort to negative...

GST ITC Rejection on Property Constructed for Leasing Can’t Ignore Supreme Court’s Safari Retreats Ruling: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside assessment orders rejecting input tax credit (ITC)...

CBIC Reviews JNCH Preparedness for 100% Non-Intrusive Inspection of Import Containers

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has reviewed the preparedness of...