Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxIncome Tax Dept. Uncovers Rs. 5,500 Crore Fake Political Donations Racket

Income Tax Dept. Uncovers Rs. 5,500 Crore Fake Political Donations Racket

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a massive crackdown, the Income Tax Department has unearthed a Rs. 5,500 crore fake political donations racket involving 36 shell political parties and over 1.6 lakh bogus donors. The investigation has revealed an elaborate money-laundering scheme where funds were allegedly round-tripped through fake donations to claim fraudulent tax deductions.

According to officials, the operation was part of a coordinated effort by certain intermediaries who created fictitious political entities registered under Section 29C of the Representation of the People Act. These shell parties received large sums of money through banking channels, purportedly as political donations. However, the funds were subsequently siphoned back to the original contributors after deducting a commission — enabling them to illegally claim tax benefits under Section 80GGC of the Income Tax Act.

Preliminary findings indicate that more than ₹4,400 crore worth of bogus deductions were claimed using these fabricated transactions. The department has identified several companies and individuals who allegedly participated in the scheme to convert unaccounted income into legitimate tax-exempt political donations.

Sources stated that the probe was launched after data analytics flagged unusual patterns of donations to obscure political outfits with minimal or no electoral activity. Raids conducted across multiple states led to the seizure of digital evidence, documents, and bank records linking the fake donors to the political entities.

Read More: Scrap Seizure Case: Jharkhand High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Scrap Dealer 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Supplementary Invoices in Absence of Fraud or Suppression: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrongful ITC Availment: GSTAT Quashes Demand Beyond SCN

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...

GST Appeal Filed Within 3 Months After Excluding Order Date Can’t Be Rejected as Delayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected solely on...

Jurisdictional Officer Can’t Issue Reassessment Notice Where NFAC Has Exclusive Authority: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has disposed of a taxpayer’s challenge to reassessment...

More like this

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Supplementary Invoices in Absence of Fraud or Suppression: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrongful ITC Availment: GSTAT Quashes Demand Beyond SCN

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...

GST Appeal Filed Within 3 Months After Excluding Order Date Can’t Be Rejected as Delayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected solely on...