HomeOther LawsScrap Seizure Case: Jharkhand High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Scrap Dealer 

Scrap Seizure Case: Jharkhand High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Scrap Dealer 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jharkhand High Court has granted anticipatory bail to a scrap dealer,  Dineshwar Saw who was apprehending arrest in connection with a case involving alleged irregularities linked to the sale of iron scrap. 

The bench Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi has observed that  the petitioner appeared to be a legitimate scrap dealer engaged in regular business, and the prosecution had not shown any criminal antecedent. Taking these factors into account, the Court found grounds to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail. 

The petitioner, Dineshwar Saw, a 62-year-old scrap trader and proprietor of M/s Dineshwar Saw, had moved the High Court seeking protection from arrest in Telaiya Police Station Case No. 240 of 2025, registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2), and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. 

During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel argued that the seized iron scrap was lawfully owned and not stolen property. It was submitted that the material had been sold through regular business channels to M/s Tushyam Mattel Pvt. Limited, located at Gajhandi Road, Gumo, and that the petitioner held a valid GST registration associated with the transaction. 

It was further emphasized that the petitioner had no prior criminal record, a fact disclosed in the anticipatory bail application. 

Opposing the plea, the State’s counsel contended that the iron scrap in question was indeed sold by the petitioner but raised objections on granting relief. 

The Court directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court within three weeks, and upon such surrender or arrest, be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount. The bail is subject to compliance with the conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. 

Case Details

Case Title: Dineshwar Saw Versus The State of Jharkhand 

Case No.: A. B. A. No. 6205 of 2025

Date: 30.10.2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Manoj 

Counsel For Respondent: Abhay Kr. Tiwari

Read More: Relief To Hyundai: Under Faceless Assessment Regime, Limitation Period to Run From Date of Uploading DRP Order on ITBA Portal: Delhi HC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

China Plans New Gold Import Rules as Bullion Imports Surge

China Proposes Major Gold Import Reforms as Bullion Imports Hit Two-Year High Despite Cooling...

Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Composite Cargo Handling Contracts Can’t Be Split into GTA Services: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that...

More like this

China Plans New Gold Import Rules as Bullion Imports Surge

China Proposes Major Gold Import Reforms as Bullion Imports Hit Two-Year High Despite Cooling...

Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...