Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxIncome Tax Dept. Defrauded By Scammer 60 Times: Scammer Deployed By Aggrieved...

Income Tax Dept. Defrauded By Scammer 60 Times: Scammer Deployed By Aggrieved Businessmen On Commission Basis

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Kamlesh Shah, a resident of Science City Road, has been implicated in a widespread scam that defrauded the Income Tax Department in at least 60 cases nationwide. Shah reportedly created fake backdated documents to claim confiscated cash during IT raids as his own, returning the money to its original owners in exchange for a substantial commission.

How the Fraud Unfolded

Shah worked alongside his wife, Meena Shah, and associates Devang Jagdish Vyas, Gaurang Panchal of Navrangpura, and Ramesh Thakkar. Businesses such as N R Company in Ratanpole and ND Gold Jewellery LLP on CG Road were reportedly complicit in the scheme.

Shah’s strategy was both bold and ingenious. Following Income Tax raids in cities like Ahmedabad, Delhi, and Mumbai, he would swiftly produce forged backdated documents claiming the confiscated cash was part of his agricultural business—a sector largely transacted in cash and exempt from tax scrutiny. By exploiting this loophole, Shah was able to convince officials to release the funds.

The Scam’s Modus Operandi

Under Indian tax laws, confiscated cash is subject to a 77% tax, a 6% penalty, and additional interest, which often exceeds the cash’s actual value. Shah positioned himself as a savior for businesses, offering to “legitimize” their seized money.

Using fabricated documentation, he claimed ownership of the funds and secured their release. Once the IT Department returned the money, Shah handed it back to the businesses or their promoters, pocketing a 30% commission.

The scam benefited businesses seeking to avoid hefty penalties and earned Shah massive profits, allowing him to operate on a large scale across multiple states.

Read More: CBIC Cautions Against Fraudsters Issuing Fake And Fraudulent Summons For GST Violations

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Strict Procedure for Re-Arrest After Illegal Arrest: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that when an accused is released because the arrest...

IBC S. 96(4) Amendment Applies Retroactively to Pending Proceedings: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that the amendment introducing sub-section (4) to Section...

Issue Already Undergoing Trial Can’t Later Be Treated as Preliminary Issue: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has clarified the circumstances in which a civil court can try...

More like this

Strict Procedure for Re-Arrest After Illegal Arrest: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that when an accused is released because the arrest...

IBC S. 96(4) Amendment Applies Retroactively to Pending Proceedings: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that the amendment introducing sub-section (4) to Section...